Draft Agenda for 1st IANA RC Teleconference
Based on Jason and Douglas feedback could we agree in the below agenda?
Personally, I think it’s quite ambitious so I would allocate 2 hours.
Comments/suggestions are welcomed
0. Agenda Review 1. roll call 2. discussion of minutes/notes/recording 3. Leadership of the team 4. Review of charter https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Review-Committee-Charter_FINALclean.p... 4.1 Questions of understanding about charter 5. Discussion of high level role and procedures https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GCV5BtB8ew2yVdEfMI6_ulW9UebFF4W8Agtx5Pv5... 5.1 Document areas of agreement 5.2 Document areas of disagreement 6. Organizational structure 6.1 document proposed structure 6.2 document objections to proposed structure 6.3 process for organizational role selection 7. Discussion of detailed procedures 7.1 list of procedures needed 7.2 rough details of each procedure (not specific text) 7.2.1 document areas of agreement 7.2.2 document areas of dis-agreement 7.2.3 discuss possible conflicts with charter and need for re-charting 7.2.3.1 All meetings via teleconference 8. Meeting schedule and next meeting dates. 9. Review decisions made, decisions pending, action items 10. Any other business
German
The Agenda looks good to me...
I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3. Leadership of the team" If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda as is should be fine.
If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we may need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.
We have a bit of a boot strapping issue, so we may have to make some decisions about things prior to have a procedure for how to make such a decision. This is not unprecedented considering how the RC appointments were made, and (in my opinion) should not be an issue, but it is best to bring it up and make sure there are no concerns.
___Jason
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:39 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Based on Jason and Douglas feedback could we agree in the below agenda?
Personally, I think it’s quite ambitious so I would allocate 2 hours.
Comments/suggestions are welcomed
- Agenda Review
- roll call
- discussion of minutes/notes/recording
- Leadership of the team
- Review of charter https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Review-
Committee-Charter_FINALclean.pdf 4.1 Questions of understanding about charter 5. Discussion of high level role and procedures https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GCV5BtB8ew2yVdEfMI6_ ulW9UebFF4W8Agtx5Pv5Mfg/edit?pref=2&pli=1 5.1 Document areas of agreement 5.2 Document areas of disagreement 6. Organizational structure 6.1 document proposed structure 6.2 document objections to proposed structure 6.3 process for organizational role selection 7. Discussion of detailed procedures 7.1 list of procedures needed 7.2 rough details of each procedure (not specific text) 7.2.1 document areas of agreement 7.2.2 document areas of dis-agreement 7.2.3 discuss possible conflicts with charter and need for re-charting 7.2.3.1 All meetings via teleconference 8. Meeting schedule and next meeting dates. 9. Review decisions made, decisions pending, action items 10. Any other business
German _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hello,
I cannot commit to a 2hr meeting. My schedule picked this up as a 1 hr meeting and another meeting straight after is already scheduled.
Kind regards Filiz
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Feb 2017, at 15:45, Jason Schiller jschiller@google.com wrote:
The Agenda looks good to me...
I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3. Leadership of the team" If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda as is should be fine.
If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we may need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.
We have a bit of a boot strapping issue, so we may have to make some decisions about things prior to have a procedure for how to make such a decision. This is not unprecedented considering how the RC appointments were made, and (in my opinion) should not be an issue, but it is best to bring it up and make sure there are no concerns.
___Jason
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:39 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Based on Jason and Douglas feedback could we agree in the below agenda?
Personally, I think it’s quite ambitious so I would allocate 2 hours.
Comments/suggestions are welcomed
- Agenda Review
- roll call
- discussion of minutes/notes/recording
- Leadership of the team
- Review of charter https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Review-Committee-Charter_FINALclean.p... 4.1 Questions of understanding about charter
- Discussion of high level role and procedures https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GCV5BtB8ew2yVdEfMI6_ulW9UebFF4W8Agtx5Pv5... 5.1 Document areas of agreement 5.2 Document areas of disagreement
- Organizational structure 6.1 document proposed structure 6.2 document objections to proposed structure 6.3 process for organizational role selection
- Discussion of detailed procedures 7.1 list of procedures needed 7.2 rough details of each procedure (not specific text) 7.2.1 document areas of agreement 7.2.2 document areas of dis-agreement 7.2.3 discuss possible conflicts with charter and need for re-charting 7.2.3.1 All meetings via teleconference
- Meeting schedule and next meeting dates.
- Review decisions made, decisions pending, action items
- Any other business
German _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.com|571-266-0006
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Can we re-optimize the agenda to do the more critical stuff first?
__Jason
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Filiz Yilmaz koalafil@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I cannot commit to a 2hr meeting. My schedule picked this up as a 1 hr meeting and another meeting straight after is already scheduled.
Kind regards Filiz
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Feb 2017, at 15:45, Jason Schiller jschiller@google.com wrote:
The Agenda looks good to me...
I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3. Leadership of the team" If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda as is should be fine.
If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we may need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.
We have a bit of a boot strapping issue, so we may have to make some decisions about things prior to have a procedure for how to make such a decision. This is not unprecedented considering how the RC appointments were made, and (in my opinion) should not be an issue, but it is best to bring it up and make sure there are no concerns.
___Jason
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:39 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Based on Jason and Douglas feedback could we agree in the below agenda?
Personally, I think it’s quite ambitious so I would allocate 2 hours.
Comments/suggestions are welcomed
- Agenda Review
- roll call
- discussion of minutes/notes/recording
- Leadership of the team
- Review of charter https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Review-Committee-
Charter_FINALclean.pdf 4.1 Questions of understanding about charter 5. Discussion of high level role and procedures https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GCV5BtB8ew2yVdEfMI6_ulW9 UebFF4W8Agtx5Pv5Mfg/edit?pref=2&pli=1 5.1 Document areas of agreement 5.2 Document areas of disagreement 6. Organizational structure 6.1 document proposed structure 6.2 document objections to proposed structure 6.3 process for organizational role selection 7. Discussion of detailed procedures 7.1 list of procedures needed 7.2 rough details of each procedure (not specific text) 7.2.1 document areas of agreement 7.2.2 document areas of dis-agreement 7.2.3 discuss possible conflicts with charter and need for re-charting 7.2.3.1 All meetings via teleconference 8. Meeting schedule and next meeting dates. 9. Review decisions made, decisions pending, action items 10. Any other business
German _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.com|571-266-0006 <(571)%20266-0006>
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi Jason, et al
On 10 February 2017 at 17:45, Jason Schiller jschiller@google.com wrote:
I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3. Leadership of the team" If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda as is should be fine.
If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we may need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.
As the proposer of this item, I meant it to be a comprehensive item on leadership: roles allowed within the charter, tenure, selection/election process e.t.c.
I appreciate the fact that these items may be prerequisites to the election of leadership for the team, and that as as a result, it might prove difficult to select/elect a chair during the meeting.
I chose to leave this item a bit open, because I thought it would allow the meeting the latitude to choose a meeting chair and exhaustively debate the requirements for choosing a substantive, or temporary chair. I thought this route would allows us to defer election/selection of leadership in the event that the requirements can't be satisfied during the meeting, without a problem.
Regards,
Hi
While we establish the ways to formally elect a chair for this committee, could we have some sort of agreement for a temporary chair or we can call it moderator for this 1st teleconference. This is important in order to have a productive meeting.
Regards
German
On 11 Feb 2017, at 5:48 PM, Douglas Onyango ondouglas@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason, et al
On 10 February 2017 at 17:45, Jason Schiller jschiller@google.com wrote:
I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3. Leadership of the team" If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda as is should be fine.
If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we may need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.
As the proposer of this item, I meant it to be a comprehensive item on leadership: roles allowed within the charter, tenure, selection/election process e.t.c.
I appreciate the fact that these items may be prerequisites to the election of leadership for the team, and that as as a result, it might prove difficult to select/elect a chair during the meeting.
I chose to leave this item a bit open, because I thought it would allow the meeting the latitude to choose a meeting chair and exhaustively debate the requirements for choosing a substantive, or temporary chair. I thought this route would allows us to defer election/selection of leadership in the event that the requirements can't be satisfied during the meeting, without a problem.
Regards,
I, personally, an happy with the Approach Douglas suggets, and for the agenda to be modified to have a more extensive leadership discussion.
___Jason
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:48 AM Douglas Onyango ondouglas@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason, et al
On 10 February 2017 at 17:45, Jason Schiller jschiller@google.com wrote:
I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3.
Leadership
of the team"
If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda
as
is should be fine.
If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we
may
need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.
As the proposer of this item, I meant it to be a comprehensive item on
leadership: roles allowed within the charter, tenure,
selection/election process e.t.c.
I appreciate the fact that these items may be prerequisites to the
election of leadership for the team, and that as as a result, it might
prove difficult to select/elect a chair during the meeting.
I chose to leave this item a bit open, because I thought it would
allow the meeting the latitude to choose a meeting chair and
exhaustively debate the requirements for choosing a substantive, or
temporary chair. I thought this route would allows us to defer
election/selection of leadership in the event that the requirements
can't be satisfied during the meeting, without a problem.
Regards,
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.net
participants (5)
-
Douglas Onyango -
Filiz Yilmaz -
German Valdez -
Jason Schiller -
Jason Schiller