I, personally, an happy with the Approach Douglas suggets, and for the agenda to be modified to have a more extensive leadership discussion.  


___Jason

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:48 AM Douglas Onyango <ondouglas@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jason, et al



On 10 February 2017 at 17:45, Jason Schiller <jschiller@google.com> wrote:

> I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3. Leadership

> of the team"

> If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda as

> is should be fine.

>

> If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we may

> need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.



As the proposer of this item, I meant it to be a comprehensive item on

leadership: roles allowed within the charter, tenure,

selection/election process e.t.c.



I appreciate the fact that these items may be prerequisites to the

election of leadership for the team, and that as as a result, it might

prove difficult to select/elect a chair during the meeting.



I chose to leave this item a bit open, because I thought it would

allow the meeting the latitude to choose a meeting chair and

exhaustively debate the requirements for choosing a substantive, or

temporary chair. I thought this route would allows us to defer

election/selection of leadership in the event that the requirements

can't be satisfied during the meeting, without a problem.



Regards,



_______________________________________________

Rc mailing list

Rc@nro.net

https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc