IANA Numbering Services Reports 2020
Hi all,
In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020.
Kind regards, Nurani IANA RC chair
Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports https://www.iana.org/performance/number No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC
All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and Accurately implemented. Below are the details of the allocations made:
2020-03-05 AS Number 2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC 0.3 business days 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.2 business days 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
2020-04-01 AS Number 2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE NCC 0.3 business days 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 1.0 business days 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
2020-05-18 AS Number 2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
2020-10-19 AS Number 2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC 0.5 business days 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.9 business days 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
Thank you for compiling this, Nurani!
I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY/edit prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it).
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno nurani@nimblebits.net wrote:
Hi all,
In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020.
Kind regards, Nurani IANA RC chair
*Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports* https://www.iana.org/performance/number No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC
All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and Accurately implemented. Below are the details of the allocations made:
*2020-03-05 AS Number*2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC 0.3 business days 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.2 business days 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
*2020-04-01 AS Number *2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE NCC 0.3 business days 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 1.0 business days 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
*2020-05-18 AS Number *2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
*2020-10-19 AS Number *2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC 0.5 business days 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.9 business days 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Thanks all,
-M<
````
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
Thank you for compiling this, Nurani!
I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY/edit prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it).
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno nurani@nimblebits.net wrote:
Hi all,
In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020.
Kind regards, Nurani IANA RC chair
*Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports* https://www.iana.org/performance/number No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC
All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and Accurately implemented. Below are the details of the allocations made:
*2020-03-05 AS Number*2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC 0.3 business days 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.2 business days 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
*2020-04-01 AS Number *2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE NCC 0.3 business days 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 1.0 business days 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
*2020-05-18 AS Number *2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
*2020-10-19 AS Number *2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC 0.5 business days 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.9 business days 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.net
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.net
Louie, German — one point I can use some assistance with. I seem to recall these calls are open to public observers. Is this correct? Since this list is open and meeting info has gone out, I would like to ensure that some of our seat 9 candidates are aware and can opt in if they’d like.
Thank you,
-M<
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:00 Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Thanks all,
-M<
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee <louie@louie.net> wrote: > Thank you for compiling this, Nurani! > > I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY/edit> > prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it). > > Louie > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations >> made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020. >> >> Kind regards, >> Nurani >> IANA RC chair >> >> *Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports* >> https://www.iana.org/performance/number >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. >> March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC >> April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC >> May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. >> October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC >> >> All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and >> Accurately implemented. >> Below are the details of the allocations made: >> >> >> *2020-03-05 AS Number*2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.2 business days >> 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-04-01 AS Number *2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE >> NCC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 1.0 business days >> 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-05-18 AS Number *2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-10-19 AS Number *2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC >> 0.5 business days >> 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.9 business days >> 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Rc mailing list >> >> >> Rc@nro.net >> >> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Rc mailing list > > Rc@nro.net > > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc > >
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Louie, German — one point I can use some assistance with. I seem to recall these calls are open to public observers. Is this correct? Since this list is open and meeting info has gone out, I would like to ensure that some of our seat 9 candidates are aware and can opt in if they’d like.
You are correct, Martin. The list is open and the meetings are open to public observers.
I would support the idea of emailing all the ICANN Board Seat 9 candidates with a pointer to our list and an invitation to observe on our calls.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:00 Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie
Thanks all,
-M<
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee <louie@louie.net> wrote: > Thank you for compiling this, Nurani! > > I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY/edit> > prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it). > > Louie > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations >> made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020. >> >> Kind regards, >> Nurani >> IANA RC chair >> >> *Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports* >> https://www.iana.org/performance/number >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. >> March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC >> April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC >> May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. >> October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC >> >> All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and >> Accurately implemented. >> Below are the details of the allocations made: >> >> >> *2020-03-05 AS Number*2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.2 business days >> 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-04-01 AS Number *2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE >> NCC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 1.0 business days >> 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-05-18 AS Number *2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-10-19 AS Number *2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC >> 0.5 business days >> 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.9 business days >> 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Rc mailing list >> >> >> Rc@nro.net >> >> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Rc mailing list > > Rc@nro.net > > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc > >
Maybe we can use an infographic for the 1st page. I hacked something together from Canva.com. Please see attached.
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:08 PM Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Louie, German — one point I can use some assistance with. I seem to recall these calls are open to public observers. Is this correct? Since this list is open and meeting info has gone out, I would like to ensure that some of our seat 9 candidates are aware and can opt in if they’d like.
You are correct, Martin. The list is open and the meetings are open to public observers.
I would support the idea of emailing all the ICANN Board Seat 9 candidates with a pointer to our list and an invitation to observe on our calls.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:00 Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie
Thanks all,
-M<
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee <louie@louie.net> wrote: > Thank you for compiling this, Nurani! > > I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY/edit> > prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it). > > Louie > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the >> allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far >> in 2020. >> >> Kind regards, >> Nurani >> IANA RC chair >> >> *Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports* >> https://www.iana.org/performance/number >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. >> March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC >> April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC >> May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September >> 2020. >> October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC >> >> All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and >> Accurately implemented. >> Below are the details of the allocations made: >> >> >> *2020-03-05 AS Number*2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from >> AFRINIC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.2 business days >> 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-04-01 AS Number *2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE >> NCC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 1.0 business days >> 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-05-18 AS Number *2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from >> LACNIC >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-10-19 AS Number *2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC >> 0.5 business days >> 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.9 business days >> 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Rc mailing list >> >> >> Rc@nro.net >> >> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Rc mailing list > > Rc@nro.net > > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc > >
I just had to tweak it. Here's version 0.2 of the infographic. (I'm going to bed now. 🙂 )
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:35 PM Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
Maybe we can use an infographic for the 1st page. I hacked something together from Canva.com. Please see attached.
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:08 PM Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Louie, German — one point I can use some assistance with. I seem to recall these calls are open to public observers. Is this correct? Since this list is open and meeting info has gone out, I would like to ensure that some of our seat 9 candidates are aware and can opt in if they’d like.
You are correct, Martin. The list is open and the meetings are open to public observers.
I would support the idea of emailing all the ICANN Board Seat 9 candidates with a pointer to our list and an invitation to observe on our calls.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:00 Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie
Thanks all,
-M<
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee <louie@louie.net> wrote: > Thank you for compiling this, Nurani! > > I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY/edit> > prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it). > > Louie > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the >> allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far >> in 2020. >> >> Kind regards, >> Nurani >> IANA RC chair >> >> *Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports* >> https://www.iana.org/performance/number >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February >> 2020. >> March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC >> April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC >> May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September >> 2020. >> October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC >> >> All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and >> Accurately implemented. >> Below are the details of the allocations made: >> >> >> *2020-03-05 AS Number*2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from >> AFRINIC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.2 business days >> 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-04-01 AS Number *2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from >> RIPE NCC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 1.0 business days >> 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-05-18 AS Number *2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from >> LACNIC >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> >> *2020-10-19 AS Number *2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from >> APNIC >> 0.5 business days >> 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.9 business days >> 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Rc mailing list >> >> >> Rc@nro.net >> >> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Rc mailing list > > Rc@nro.net > > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc > >
Hi all,
Thanks for that Louie. I’m happy to have a brief discussion about this at our call. In fact, in our post mortem from last year, we said we’d ask the RIR Communications teams to help with this. The action point was taken by Jason, but we might ask the RIR staff members of the team to follow up on this.
As to Martin’s question, these calls are indeed open to anyone to attend. Can I confirm with you German that you have announced the call and made the details available publicly?
Kind regards,
Nurani
On 24 Nov 2020, at 08:04, Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
I just had to tweak it. Here's version 0.2 of the infographic. (I'm going to bed now. 🙂 )
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:35 PM Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote: Maybe we can use an infographic for the 1st page. I hacked something together from Canva.com. Please see attached.
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:08 PM Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Louie, German — one point I can use some assistance with. I seem to recall these calls are open to public observers. Is this correct? Since this list is open and meeting info has gone out, I would like to ensure that some of our seat 9 candidates are aware and can opt in if they’d like.
You are correct, Martin. The list is open and the meetings are open to public observers.
I would support the idea of emailing all the ICANN Board Seat 9 candidates with a pointer to our list and an invitation to observe on our calls.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:00 Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie
Thanks all,
-M<
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee <louie@louie.net> wrote: > Thank you for compiling this, Nurani! > > I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it). > > Louie > >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020. >> >> Kind regards, >> Nurani >> IANA RC chair >> >> Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports >> https://www.iana.org/performance/number >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. >> March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC >> April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC >> May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. >> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. >> October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC >> >> All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and Accurately implemented. >> Below are the details of the allocations made: >> >> 2020-03-05 AS Number >> 2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.2 business days >> 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> 2020-04-01 AS Number >> 2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE NCC >> 0.3 business days >> 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 1.0 business days >> 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> 2020-05-18 AS Number >> 2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.1 business days >> 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> 2020-10-19 AS Number >> 2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC >> 0.5 business days >> 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged >> Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) >> 0.9 business days >> 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) >> Implemented on time (within 4 business days) >> Implemented accurately >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Rc mailing list >> >> >> Rc@nro.net >> >> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rc mailing list > > Rc@nro.net > > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc ><2020 IANA Numbering Services Review Committee infographic v0.2.pdf> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi
It was published in the NRO Website but I think it’s a good time to remind the RIR communities of the openness of the IANA RC meetings now that a new cycle is about to start.
Something I can help to coordinate with the RIR communications staff
Regards
German
From: rc-bounces@nro.net rc-bounces@nro.net Date: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 at 8:47 pm To: Louie Lee louie@louie.net Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] IANA Numbering Services Reports 2020 Hi all,
Thanks for that Louie. I’m happy to have a brief discussion about this at our call. In fact, in our post mortem from last year, we said we’d ask the RIR Communications teams to help with this. The action point was taken by Jason, but we might ask the RIR staff members of the team to follow up on this.
As to Martin’s question, these calls are indeed open to anyone to attend. Can I confirm with you German that you have announced the call and made the details available publicly?
Kind regards,
Nurani
On 24 Nov 2020, at 08:04, Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote: I just had to tweak it. Here's version 0.2 of the infographic. (I'm going to bed now. 🙂 )
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:35 PM Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> wrote: Maybe we can use an infographic for the 1st page. I hacked something together from Canva.com. Please see attached.
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:08 PM Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.commailto:hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
Louie, German — one point I can use some assistance with. I seem to recall these calls are open to public observers. Is this correct? Since this list is open and meeting info has gone out, I would like to ensure that some of our seat 9 candidates are aware and can opt in if they’d like.
You are correct, Martin. The list is open and the meetings are open to public observers.
I would support the idea of emailing all the ICANN Board Seat 9 candidates with a pointer to our list and an invitation to observe on our calls.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:00 Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.commailto:hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie
Thanks all,
-M<
````
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> wrote: Thank you for compiling this, Nurani!
I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 reporthttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY%2Fedit&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637523807%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=bAsfwc6onL%2BMmcBFM3jgRdj3ZOo8SodAz4VLbLrAQRk%3D&reserved=0 prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it).
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote: Hi all,
In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020.
Kind regards, Nurani IANA RC chair
Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports https://www.iana.org/performance/numberhttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fperformance%2Fnumber&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637523807%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SL33D9OHgv5cNMOZzo6jnpyzEuPLxbc5C%2F%2FkvJ5OelE%3D&reserved=0 No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC
All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and Accurately implemented. Below are the details of the allocations made:
2020-03-05 AS Number 2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC 0.3 business days 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.2 business days 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
2020-04-01 AS Number 2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE NCC 0.3 business days 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 1.0 business days 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
2020-05-18 AS Number 2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately
2020-10-19 AS Number 2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC 0.5 business days 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.9 business days 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately _______________________________________________
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637533772%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=RDMvO0AQLcGP%2BQkgNkhxsTNSBYsLZulwAXWWRNWJmTU%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637533772%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=RDMvO0AQLcGP%2BQkgNkhxsTNSBYsLZulwAXWWRNWJmTU%3D&reserved=0
<2020 IANA Numbering Services Review Committee infographic v0.2.pdf> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Thanks for that German.
And a correction from my side. The JS action point was of course not for Jason, but for John Sweeting. :)
See you in less than ten minutes!
Nurani
On 24 Nov 2020, at 12:48, German Valdez german@apnic.net wrote:
Hi
It was published in the NRO Website but I think it’s a good time to remind the RIR communities of the openness of the IANA RC meetings now that a new cycle is about to start.
Something I can help to coordinate with the RIR communications staff
Regards
German
From: rc-bounces@nro.net rc-bounces@nro.net Date: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 at 8:47 pm To: Louie Lee louie@louie.net Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] IANA Numbering Services Reports 2020
Hi all,
Thanks for that Louie. I’m happy to have a brief discussion about this at our call. In fact, in our post mortem from last year, we said we’d ask the RIR Communications teams to help with this. The action point was taken by Jason, but we might ask the RIR staff members of the team to follow up on this.
As to Martin’s question, these calls are indeed open to anyone to attend. Can I confirm with you German that you have announced the call and made the details available publicly?
Kind regards,
Nurani
On 24 Nov 2020, at 08:04, Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
I just had to tweak it. Here's version 0.2 of the infographic. (I'm going to bed now. 🙂 )
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:35 PM Louie Lee <louie@louie.net mailto:louie@louie.net> wrote: Maybe we can use an infographic for the 1st page. I hacked something together from Canva.com. Please see attached.
Louie
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:08 PM Louie Lee <louie@louie.net mailto:louie@louie.net> wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com mailto:hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
Louie, German — one point I can use some assistance with. I seem to recall these calls are open to public observers. Is this correct? Since this list is open and meeting info has gone out, I would like to ensure that some of our seat 9 candidates are aware and can opt in if they’d like.
You are correct, Martin. The list is open and the meetings are open to public observers.
I would support the idea of emailing all the ICANN Board Seat 9 candidates with a pointer to our list and an invitation to observe on our calls.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:00 Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com mailto:hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Louie. Great stuff.
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie
Thanks all,
-M<
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 18:14 Louie Lee <louie@louie.net <mailto:louie@louie.net>> wrote: Thank you for compiling this, Nurani! I'll try to update the draft of the 2020 report <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1mFYtyZpHNQZwH-tcldSEEAmw7ck46YRQMXCgKmHCOqY%2Fedit&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637523807%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=bAsfwc6onL%2BMmcBFM3jgRdj3ZOo8SodAz4VLbLrAQRk%3D&reserved=0> prior to the meeting tomorrow (unless someone else wants to jump and do it). Louie On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote: Hi all, In preparation of tomorrow’s meeting, below you’ll find the allocations made by IANA to the RIRs as reported on the IANA website so far in 2020. Kind regards, Nurani IANA RC chair Monthly IANA Number Resource Performance Reports https://www.iana.org/performance/number <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fperformance%2Fnumber&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637523807%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SL33D9OHgv5cNMOZzo6jnpyzEuPLxbc5C%2F%2FkvJ5OelE%3D&reserved=0> No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in January 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in February 2020. March: 2020-03-05 AS Number AFRINIC April: 2020-04-01 AS Number RIPE NCC May: 2020-05-18 AS Number LACNIC No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in June 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in July 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in August 2020. No Regional Internet Registry requests were performed in September 2020. October: 2020-10-19 AS Number APNIC All allocations were Responded on time, Implemented on time and Accurately implemented. Below are the details of the allocations made: 2020-03-05 AS Number 2020-03-05 10:42:06 Request received from AFRINIC 0.3 business days 2020-03-05 18:21:57 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.2 business days 2020-03-05 22:11:12 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately 2020-04-01 AS Number 2020-03-31 11:42:38 Request received from RIPE NCC 0.3 business days 2020-03-31 18:45:42 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 1.0 business days 2020-04-01 19:39:45 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately 2020-05-18 AS Number 2020-05-18 14:17:27 Request received from LACNIC 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 16:08:13 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.1 business days 2020-05-18 18:36:01 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately 2020-10-19 AS Number 2020-10-19 07:20:16 Request received from APNIC 0.5 business days 2020-10-19 20:25:51 Request acknowledged Acknowledged on time (within 2 business days) 0.9 business days 2020-10-20 18:13:27 Implemented using resource(s) Implemented on time (within 4 business days) Implemented accurately _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637533772%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=RDMvO0AQLcGP%2BQkgNkhxsTNSBYsLZulwAXWWRNWJmTU%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6376de9836dc462123b308d890665c2d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418116637533772%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=RDMvO0AQLcGP%2BQkgNkhxsTNSBYsLZulwAXWWRNWJmTU%3D&reserved=0> <2020 IANA Numbering Services Review Committee infographic v0.2.pdf> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:09 AM Louie Lee louie@louie.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
[ clip ]
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this
report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie, Condensing the report into an infographic summary for the first is a great idea.
I do see some room for improvements.
Here's one example:
"The RC notes that one comment was received in the public comment period supporting the conclusions that the SLAs for the IANA numbering service have been met 100%. The full comment is included in Appendix 2".
We might consider condensing this to:
"One comment was received during the public comment period. See Appendix A". 36 words to 12. Feels like there are a lot of candidates for such a reduction.
I'm happy to help propose a version if useful and helpful.
Warm regards,
-M<
Hi Martin and Louie,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Like I said on today’s call, our task is important but in essence rather simple.
We are here to offer a medium for the community to provide feedback on how the IANA performance has been according to the SLA. It increases the transparency towards the community and it gives the stakeholders an opportunity to raise concerns if the performance of IANA It will most likely never be an exciting report, but that doesn’t mean it still serves a good purpose. There have been some suggestions in the past to make the report more detailed, but we have tried to find the right balance, and keep it fairly short and simple.
One of the pieces of feedback when I presented this in the RIPE community was “Great work. Boring is good!”, which I think sums up the somewhat simple (boring) but important task we have. :)
We have made a conscious effort in the past years to produce a fairly standardised report, can be easily reproduced every year and that is not overly cumbersome for the IANA RC members to produce in a short space of time, but that still has all the right information included. We also wanted to make sure we could work collaboratively in a tool that is accessible to all RC members. We have made it accessible on the web as well as in a downloadable PDF format.
I don’t think we can or should reduce this report to a one pager, but that doesn’t mean that we can’t improve it of course! We have asked the RIRs to get help from their comms teams to “prettify” the RIR Matrix as that is the element that the RIRs are responsible for. So I encourage everyone to provide feedback to the suggested format that John circulated on the list yesterday.
If you want to send a draft report to the list with the suggested changes to next year’s report outside of the Matrix, we can make some room at our January meeting to consider them.
Thanks again.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 24 Nov 2020, at 13:55, Martin Hannigan hannigan@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:09 AM Louie Lee <louie@louie.net mailto:louie@louie.net> wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com mailto:hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
[ clip ]
I’d like to see us consider adding an agenda item on how to boil this report down. There is a lot of good information, but my reading made me feel like I was reading the report all over. If this is an analysis, perhaps we can figure out how to get it to a one pager that is digestable by “anyone”?
Indeed, the report has more background information than actual analysis and conclusion. I believe that this approach was initially adopted so that the report can stand on their own.
I would agree, though, that it is worth revisiting to produce a more digestible report. Much of the background and supporting information can be moved to the appendix or linked to the web content.
Do you have a report format in mind? I would love to see us mimic a report that is concise, useful, and compelling.
Louie, Condensing the report into an infographic summary for the first is a great idea.
I do see some room for improvements.
Here's one example:
"The RC notes that one comment was received in the public comment period supporting the conclusions that the SLAs for the IANA numbering service have been met 100%. The full comment is included in Appendix 2".
We might consider condensing this to:
"One comment was received during the public comment period. See Appendix A". 36 words to 12. Feels like there are a lot of candidates for such a reduction.
I'm happy to help propose a version if useful and helpful.
Warm regards,
-M<
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 3:03 AM Nurani Nimpuno nurani@nimblebits.net wrote:
Hi Martin and Louie,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Like I said on today’s call, our task is important but in essence rather simple.
[ clip ]
We have made a conscious effort in the past years to produce a fairly
standardised report, can be easily reproduced every year and that is not overly cumbersome for the IANA RC members to produce in a short space of time, but that still has all the right information included. We also wanted to make sure we could work collaboratively in a tool that is accessible to all RC members. We have made it accessible on the web as well as in a downloadable PDF format.
I don’t think we can or should reduce this report to a one pager, but that doesn’t mean that we can’t improve it of course! We have asked the RIRs to get help from their comms teams to “prettify” the RIR Matrix as that is the element that the RIRs are responsible for. So I encourage everyone to provide feedback to the suggested format that John circulated on the list yesterday.
I'm not suggesting we reduce it to one pager per se'. However, if the IANA meets the SLA's month, after month, after month there is not a lot of advisory or analysis needed. To some extent, and for example, if they met the SLA 100% for a 12 month period we might simply comment 'the IANA is doing their job'. [note paraphrase] The rest feels like boilerplate which we may consider referencing through an incorporated URL. Perhaps we can also cut expenses of translation? My base idea would be to make it readable by a high school student so that we help further the internet community by making our complex transactions as simple as possible.
If you want to send a draft report to the list with the suggested changes
to next year’s report outside of the Matrix, we can make some room at our January meeting to consider them.
I'm on board for writing. I suggest a rethink of the report presentation would be great for 2022. For 2021, if we can reduce the page count by reducing the content and increasing its value I do have time to help [Louie?] if needed.
Thank you team!
Warm regards,
-M<
participants (4)
-
German Valdez -
Louie Lee -
Martin Hannigan -
Nurani Nimpuno