Jason,
I agree with your assessment.
Thanks and regards
Brajesh
From: Jason Schiller [mailto:jschiller@google.com] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 8:07 PM To: Brajesh Jain brajesh.jain@spectranet.in Cc: German Valdez german@nro.net; AC COORD ac-coord@aso.icann.org; rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [AC-COORD] A Note for need of Second f2f meeting of ASOAC/RC
(apologies for cross posting AC-Coord and RC)
Brajesh,
I believe the attached document is in response to action item 20170111-06: "BJ to send the suggestion about a second F2F meeting to the list."
After review of the document it seems this is justification is based on the need to complete Review Committee work.
Reading between the line I think you are suggesting that the the Review Committee members should also meet during the ASO AC face to face at the ICANN meeting. In addition, the Review Committee needs a second face to face meeting for a few years while the RC is boot strapping, and settling in.
If my assessment is correct, I would suggest that this discussion moved to the RC list.
If you agree, please respond as such and move ac-coord@aso.icaan.orgmailto:ac-coord@aso.icaan.org to bcc
Thanks,
__Jason
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Brajesh Jain <brajesh.jain@spectranet.inmailto:brajesh.jain@spectranet.in> wrote: Dear all,
I have attempted a brief note as attached for further deliberations.
Basically for Review Committee to function effectively, there is need for in depth multiple deliberations with constant feedback/inputs from Community. Such inputs are best sought through interaction being present at ICANN.
Thanks and regards
Brajesh
_______________________________________________ AC-coord mailing list AC-coord@aso.icann.orgmailto:AC-coord@aso.icann.org https://aso.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ac-coord
-- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.commailto:jschiller@google.com|571-266-0006