Jason,

I agree with your assessment.

Thanks and regards

Brajesh

From: Jason Schiller [mailto:jschiller@google.com]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 8:07 PM
To: Brajesh Jain <brajesh.jain@spectranet.in>
Cc: German Valdez <german@nro.net>; AC COORD <ac-coord@aso.icann.org>; rc@nro.net
Subject: Re: [AC-COORD] A Note for need of Second f2f meeting of ASOAC/RC

(apologies for cross posting AC-Coord and RC)

Brajesh,

I believe the attached document is in response to action item 20170111-06: 

"BJ to send the suggestion about a second F2F meeting to the list."

After review of the document it seems this is justification is based on the need to

complete Review Committee work.  

Reading between the line I think you are suggesting that the the Review Committee 

members should also meet during the ASO AC face to face at the ICANN meeting.

In addition, the Review Committee needs a second face to face meeting for a few

years while the RC is boot strapping, and settling in.   

If my assessment is correct, I would suggest that this discussion moved to the RC list.

If you agree, please respond as such and move ac-coord@aso.icaan.org to bcc

Thanks,

__Jason

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Brajesh Jain <brajesh.jain@spectranet.in> wrote:

Dear all,

I have attempted a brief note as attached for further deliberations.

Basically for Review Committee to function effectively, there is need for in depth multiple deliberations with constant feedback/inputs from Community. Such inputs are best sought  through interaction being present at ICANN.

Thanks and regards

Brajesh

_______________________________________________
AC-coord mailing list
AC-coord@aso.icann.org
https://aso.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ac-coord

--

_______________________________________________________

Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.com|571-266-0006