Hi Nate,
Thanks for that. That is a very good comment. I will add it to the document.
Nurani
On 29 Nov 2017, at 13:06, Nate Davis ndavis@arin.net wrote:
Filiz (et. al) -
This looks fine to me with one suggestion. I think we need to state the specific review period, i.e. “This review report covers the periods 1 April 2017 through 31 December 2017”. Perhaps this could be part of section 3. Methodology, sub-section 3.1 Overview?
Otherwise, looks great.
Nate
From: <rc-bounces@nro.net mailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com mailto:koalafil@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM To: "rc@nro.net mailto:rc@nro.net" <rc@nro.net mailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: [IANA-RC] IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template
Dear all,
Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link:
https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMo... https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMoawUiMKQ-K2__qbuztEDU/edit?usp=sharing
I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document. So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday).
After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic.
Kind regards Filiz
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc