On 29 Nov 2017, at 13:06, Nate Davis <ndavis@arin.net> wrote:

Filiz (et. al) -

This looks fine to me with one suggestion.  I think we need to state the specific review period, i.e. “This review report covers the periods 1 April 2017 through 31 December 2017”.  Perhaps this could be part of section 3. Methodology, sub-section 3.1 Overview?

Otherwise, looks great.

Nate

From: <rc-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM
To: "rc@nro.net" <rc@nro.net>
Subject: [IANA-RC] IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template

Dear all,

Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link:   

https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMoawUiMKQ-K2__qbuztEDU/edit?usp=sharing

I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document.  

So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday). 

After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic. 

Kind regards

Filiz

_______________________________________________
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc