I, personally, an happy with the Approach Douglas suggets, and for the agenda to be modified to have a more extensive leadership discussion.
___Jason
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:48 AM Douglas Onyango ondouglas@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason, et al
On 10 February 2017 at 17:45, Jason Schiller jschiller@google.com wrote:
I think we need to figure out what we hope to accomplish in "3.
Leadership
of the team"
If we are simply choosing a chair for the call, then I think the agenda
as
is should be fine.
If we think we can choose a non-temporary Chair (for the year) then we
may
need to also sort out more details about our organizational structure.
As the proposer of this item, I meant it to be a comprehensive item on
leadership: roles allowed within the charter, tenure,
selection/election process e.t.c.
I appreciate the fact that these items may be prerequisites to the
election of leadership for the team, and that as as a result, it might
prove difficult to select/elect a chair during the meeting.
I chose to leave this item a bit open, because I thought it would
allow the meeting the latitude to choose a meeting chair and
exhaustively debate the requirements for choosing a substantive, or
temporary chair. I thought this route would allows us to defer
election/selection of leadership in the event that the requirements
can't be satisfied during the meeting, without a problem.
Regards,
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.net