Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
Please, those pending to complete the poll could do it asap
Cheers
German
On 3 Mar 2016, at 10:44 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
I’ve updated my availability on the poll.
thanks.
On 5 Mar 2016, at 22:08, German Valdez wrote:
Please, those pending to complete the poll could do it asap
Cheers
German
On 3 Mar 2016, at 10:44 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
I have done so as well.
Greg
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Paul Wilson pwilson@apnic.net wrote:
I’ve updated my availability on the poll.
thanks.
On 5 Mar 2016, at 22:08, German Valdez wrote:
Please, those pending to complete the poll could do it asap
Cheers
German
On 3 Mar 2016, at 10:44 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Hi,
We seem to have nothing that's working super well. It looks like everyone who replied could make it at either 16:00 Monday or 13:00 Wed. I wonder whether we mightn't schedule both on the principle that we might get a enough cross-section across both spots to ensure enough communication. I'd be really happy if we could finish the week with the remaining touchy issues hammered out. What do people think?
Best regards,
A
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:12:50PM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
I have done so as well.
Greg
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Paul Wilson pwilson@apnic.net wrote:
I’ve updated my availability on the poll.
thanks.
On 5 Mar 2016, at 22:08, German Valdez wrote:
Please, those pending to complete the poll could do it asap
Cheers
German
On 3 Mar 2016, at 10:44 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO Council. (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
Greg
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have nothing that's working super well. It looks like everyone who replied could make it at either 16:00 Monday or 13:00 Wed. I wonder whether we mightn't schedule both on the principle that we might get a enough cross-section across both spots to ensure enough communication. I'd be really happy if we could finish the week with the remaining touchy issues hammered out. What do people think?
Best regards,
A
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:12:50PM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
I have done so as well.
Greg
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Paul Wilson pwilson@apnic.net wrote:
I’ve updated my availability on the poll.
thanks.
On 5 Mar 2016, at 22:08, German Valdez wrote:
Please, those pending to complete the poll could do it asap
Cheers
German
On 3 Mar 2016, at 10:44 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC
dg@apnic.net
@apnicdg
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO Council. (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
1. Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff. I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
2. Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and the community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO Council. (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and the
community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
jari
On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani izumi@nic.ad.jp wrote:
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO Council. (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and the
community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
works for me too. Nurani
On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
jari
On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani izumi@nic.ad.jp wrote:
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote: I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO Council. (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and the
community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
All,
I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single meeting?
In any event, my suggestions on logistics:
- Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as required) so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent polls. - Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines for the milestones derived from that
I suspect that the above is all second nature to this group so forgive me if so.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Nurani Nimpuno [mailto:nurani@netnod.se] Sent: 06 March 2016 22:52 To: Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net; Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55
works for me too. Nurani
On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
jari
On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani izumi@nic.ad.jp wrote:
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote: I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO
Council.
(Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and
the community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Is today at 16:00 or 16:30?
Greg
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Robinson jrobinson@afilias.info wrote:
All,
I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single meeting?
In any event, my suggestions on logistics:
- Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as
required) so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent polls.
- Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines for
the milestones derived from that
I suspect that the above is all second nature to this group so forgive me if so.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Nurani Nimpuno [mailto:nurani@netnod.se] Sent: 06 March 2016 22:52 To: Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net; Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55
works for me too. Nurani
On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
jari
On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani izumi@nic.ad.jp wrote:
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote: I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO
Council.
(Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and
the community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:27:22AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
Is today at 16:00 or 16:30?
16:30 (because you said that's when you're available).
A
Greg
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Robinson jrobinson@afilias.info wrote:
All,
I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single meeting?
In any event, my suggestions on logistics:
- Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as
required) so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent polls.
- Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines for
the milestones derived from that
I suspect that the above is all second nature to this group so forgive me if so.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Nurani Nimpuno [mailto:nurani@netnod.se] Sent: 06 March 2016 22:52 To: Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net; Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55
works for me too. Nurani
On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
jari
On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani izumi@nic.ad.jp wrote:
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote: I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO
Council.
(Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and
the community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Thanks! Now I feel special.
Greg
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:27:22AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
Is today at 16:00 or 16:30?
16:30 (because you said that's when you're available).
A
Greg
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Robinson <
jrobinson@afilias.info>
wrote:
All,
I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single meeting?
In any event, my suggestions on logistics:
- Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as
required) so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent polls.
- Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines
for
the milestones derived from that
I suspect that the above is all second nature to this group so forgive
me
if so.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Nurani Nimpuno [mailto:nurani@netnod.se] Sent: 06 March 2016 22:52 To: Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net; Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55
works for me too. Nurani
On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
jari
On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani izumi@nic.ad.jp wrote:
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote: > I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. > If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that
so
> we can start at 16:00. > > I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO
Council.
> (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be > there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid
any
status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls
stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and
the community-decides tension. I think we need to work out
language
for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then
(1)
take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is
final,"
and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Jonathan, I agree with the suggested agenda. I like especially the second point you raised to discus overall timelines.
We did agree on the two phases and target timelines, and it would be good to discuss when we can fix the principal terms and any process required for this in each Operational Community, if any.
Izumi
On 2016/03/07 23:17, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single meeting?
In any event, my suggestions on logistics:
- Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as required)
so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent polls.
- Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines for
the milestones derived from that
I suspect that the above is all second nature to this group so forgive me if so.
Thanks,
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Nurani Nimpuno [mailto:nurani@netnod.se] Sent: 06 March 2016 22:52 To: Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net; Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55
works for me too. Nurani
On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko jari.arkko@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
jari
On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani izumi@nic.ad.jp wrote:
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed.
Works for me.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote: I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish. If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so we can start at 16:00.
I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO
Council.
(Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be there)
In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday and 13:00 Wed. We'll get some of everyone. I think we should avoid any status discussion and nail down these open issues:
- Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements to bid.
- Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and
the community-decides tension. I think we need to work out language for the proposal.
I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1) take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final," and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
Does that ssound like a plan? If so, I'll try to find a place for us to meet.
A
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:17:39PM -0000, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
All,
I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single meeting?
I didn't think we'd get done what we wanted in 30 mins. But I was hoping these would be meetings where we could make some decisions and mostly take ourselves out of this henceforth.
- Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as required)
so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent polls.
I am desperately hoping that we can stop having meetings for a while. We should finish up the proposal to the extent it needs polishing, and send it to our respective communities. We can use this list thenceforth to communicate edits and alterations that might be needed.
- Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines for
the milestones derived from that
Proposal:
1. Get the principles ready [this document. Ship this week?]
2. Undertake community review [2 weeks? People've already had a peek]
3. If edits, iterate on 1-2.
4. When done, send to respective counsel and have them hammer out the agreement (this is the stage I think ICANN staff gets involved) [indeterminate time]
A
I don’t really have an agenda for the meetings this week, but I hope we can agree on a way forward.
I like Andrew’s proposal:
Proposal:
Get the principles ready [this document. Ship this week?]
Undertake community review [2 weeks? People've already had a peek]
If edits, iterate on 1-2.
When done, send to respective counsel and have them hammer out
the agreement (this is the stage I think ICANN staff gets involved) [indeterminate time]
Alan Barrett
I like Andrew’s proposal as well.
For your information, I met some people who didn’t fully realise that you could comment on the IANAPLAN list and elsewhere, while we did get some comments from others. Maybe publicising the last call phase better/more widely would be good.
Jari
Hi,
We made good progress today. Notes will be coming, but I think it important to let everyone know you have the Wed 30 minutes back; we're not meeting then.
A
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:22:47PM +0000, Jari Arkko wrote:
I like Andrew’s proposal as well.
For your information, I met some people who didn’t fully realise that you could comment on the IANAPLAN list and elsewhere, while we did get some comments from others. Maybe publicising the last call phase better/more widely would be good.
Jari
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
I can do 4pm tomorrow, probably not 1pm Weds.
Please confirm the meeting room?
Paul.
On 6 Mar 2016, at 21:20, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have nothing that's working super well. It looks like everyone who replied could make it at either 16:00 Monday or 13:00 Wed. I wonder whether we mightn't schedule both on the principle that we might get a enough cross-section across both spots to ensure enough communication. I'd be really happy if we could finish the week with the remaining touchy issues hammered out. What do people think?
Best regards,
A
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:12:50PM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
I have done so as well.
Greg
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Paul Wilson pwilson@apnic.net wrote:
I’ve updated my availability on the poll.
thanks.
On 5 Mar 2016, at 22:08, German Valdez wrote:
Please, those pending to complete the poll could do it asap
Cheers
German
On 3 Mar 2016, at 10:44 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:40:10PM +1000, Paul Wilson wrote:
I can do 4pm tomorrow, probably not 1pm Weds.
Yeah, if we do this 1/2 and 1/2, nobody can make everything. I think we're falling back to best efforts.
Please confirm the meeting room?
By "confirm" you mean "get", right? :)
A
Thanks Andrew for the suggestion.
We can use RUBIS room at those times
Monday March 7th 16:30 Wednesday March 9th 13:00
If some of the members are not in Marrakech I could facilitate a webex connection in the room. Please advise
Regards
German
On 6 Mar 2016, at 9:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:40:10PM +1000, Paul Wilson wrote:
I can do 4pm tomorrow, probably not 1pm Weds.
Yeah, if we do this 1/2 and 1/2, nobody can make everything. I think we're falling back to best efforts.
Please confirm the meeting room?
By "confirm" you mean "get", right? :)
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Perfect, thanks. Paul, it's the Rubis room :)
It's probably worth setting up the Webex room. I don't know whether anyone will need it, but surely better to have it and not need it?
A
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:59:17PM +1000, German Valdez wrote:
Thanks Andrew for the suggestion.
We can use RUBIS room at those times
Monday March 7th 16:30 Wednesday March 9th 13:00
If some of the members are not in Marrakech I could facilitate a webex connection in the room. Please advise
Regards
German
On 6 Mar 2016, at 9:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:40:10PM +1000, Paul Wilson wrote:
I can do 4pm tomorrow, probably not 1pm Weds.
Yeah, if we do this 1/2 and 1/2, nobody can make everything. I think we're falling back to best efforts.
Please confirm the meeting room?
By "confirm" you mean "get", right? :)
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Yup, better be prepared and not need it, than not prepared when needed :) In short, I agree with Andrew.
Izumi
On 2016/03/06 21:02, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Perfect, thanks. Paul, it's the Rubis room :)
It's probably worth setting up the Webex room. I don't know whether anyone will need it, but surely better to have it and not need it?
A
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:59:17PM +1000, German Valdez wrote:
Thanks Andrew for the suggestion.
We can use RUBIS room at those times
Monday March 7th 16:30 Wednesday March 9th 13:00
If some of the members are not in Marrakech I could facilitate a webex connection in the room. Please advise
Regards
German
On 6 Mar 2016, at 9:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:40:10PM +1000, Paul Wilson wrote:
I can do 4pm tomorrow, probably not 1pm Weds.
Yeah, if we do this 1/2 and 1/2, nobody can make everything. I think we're falling back to best efforts.
Please confirm the meeting room?
By "confirm" you mean "get", right? :)
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
You can use the below webex url
On 6 Mar 2016, at 9:59 PM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Thanks Andrew for the suggestion.
We can use RUBIS room at those times
Monday March 7th 16:30
https://ripencc.webex.com/ripencc/j.php?MTID=mc46376e4cdf55c58b6e8e617c6d4ca...
Wednesday March 9th 13:00
https://ripencc.webex.com/ripencc/j.php?MTID=md710b54189a6961ff14b30f1e46fbe...
If some of the members are not in Marrakech I could facilitate a webex connection in the room. Please advise
Regards
German
On 6 Mar 2016, at 9:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:40:10PM +1000, Paul Wilson wrote:
I can do 4pm tomorrow, probably not 1pm Weds.
Yeah, if we do this 1/2 and 1/2, nobody can make everything. I think we're falling back to best efforts.
Please confirm the meeting room?
By "confirm" you mean "get", right? :)
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Thank you Greg and Paul
Lise and Jari please could you complete the poll this would allow us to establish if we can have a common time with all communities represented.
Thanks
German
On 6 Mar 2016, at 3:12 AM, Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com wrote:
I have done so as well.
Greg
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Paul Wilson pwilson@apnic.net wrote: I’ve updated my availability on the poll.
thanks.
On 5 Mar 2016, at 22:08, German Valdez wrote:
Please, those pending to complete the poll could do it asap
Cheers
German
On 3 Mar 2016, at 10:44 AM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Here is a doodle poll in order to find a common time to meet during Marrakech
http://doodle.com/poll/f493whdyy7b26epn
This is based on Paul and Alan availability, hopefully we can find a time that work for the rest.
Regards
German
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
participants (10)
-
'Andrew Sullivan' -
Alan Barrett -
Andrew Sullivan
-
German Valdez -
Greg Shatan -
Izumi Okutani -
Jari Arkko -
Jonathan Robinson -
Nurani Nimpuno -
Paul Wilson