On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:27:22AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Is today at 16:00 or 16:30?

16:30 (because you said that's when you're available).

A

>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
> >
> > I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single
> > meeting?
> >
> > In any event, my suggestions on logistics:
> >
> > - Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as
> > required)
> > so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent
> > polls.
> > - Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines for
> > the milestones derived from that
> >
> > I suspect that the above is all second nature to this group so forgive me
> > if
> > so.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nurani Nimpuno [mailto:nurani@netnod.se]
> > Sent: 06 March 2016 22:52
> > To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
> > Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net; Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55
> >
> > works for me too.
> > Nurani
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
> > >
> > > jari
> > >
> > > On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> > >
> > >>> In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday
> > >>> and
> > >>> 13:00 Wed.
> > >> Works for me.
> > >>
> > >> Izumi
> > >>
> > >>> On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > >>>> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > >>>> I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish.
> > >>>> If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so
> > >>>> we can start at 16:00.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO
> > Council.
> > >>>> (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be
> > >>>> there)
> > >>>
> > >>> In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday
> > >>> and
> > >>> 13:00 Wed.  We'll get some of everyone.  I think we should avoid any
> > >>> status discussion and nail down these open issues:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1.  Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
> > >>> I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of
> > >>> thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in
> > >>> the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements
> > >>> to bid.
> > >>>
> > >>> 2.  Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and
> > >>> the community-decides tension.  I think we need to work out language
> > >>> for the proposal.
> > >>>
> > >>> I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1)
> > >>> take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final,"
> > >>> and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
> > >>>
> > >>> Does that ssound like a plan?  If so, I'll try to find a place for
> > >>> us to meet.
> > >>>
> > >>> A
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Iana-ipr mailing list
> > >> Iana-ipr@nro.net
> > >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Iana-ipr mailing list
> > > Iana-ipr@nro.net
> > > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Iana-ipr mailing list
> > Iana-ipr@nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Iana-ipr mailing list
> > Iana-ipr@nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> >

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com