Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks, Guangliang =========
From: rc-bounces@nro.net rc-bounces@nro.net On Behalf Of John Sweeting Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM To: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John,
Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments.
Thanks,
Hollis
On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John and Tommy,
I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that.
Thoughts?
Hollis
On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4953ad8353224b52e2b008d89071d7a1%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418166074919605%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=8lzR8Vr7wU6t3YO7rLPLNpIz%2F8g47tPJfda%2FBd6qA5g%3D&reserved=0
Sounds like a good idea, let me do that and get this sent out. Thanks.
From: Guangliang gpan@apnic.net Date: Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM To: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks, Guangliang =========
From: rc-bounces@nro.net rc-bounces@nro.net On Behalf Of John Sweeting Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM To: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John,
Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments.
Thanks,
Hollis
On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John and Tommy,
I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that.
Thoughts?
Hollis
On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C4953ad8353224b52e2b008d89071d7a1%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637418166074919605%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=8lzR8Vr7wU6t3YO7rLPLNpIz%2F8g47tPJfda%2FBd6qA5g%3D&reserved=0
Thanks John!
Kind regards, Guangliang ==========
From: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2020 2:44 AM To: Guangliang Pan gpan@apnic.net; IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Sounds like a good idea, let me do that and get this sent out. Thanks.
From: Guangliang <gpan@apnic.netmailto:gpan@apnic.net> Date: Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks, Guangliang =========
From: rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> On Behalf Of John Sweeting Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM To: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John,
Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments.
Thanks,
Hollis
On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John and Tommy,
I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that.
Thoughts?
Hollis
On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C2463da709b554e35b0f608d8954f57e6%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C1%7C637423515747180020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FMUe8C9DmxM9zoipaC7pSB0xTnClh4qrEgf6hG8ROMI%3D&reserved=0
I will be sending out the matrix with 2020 information sometime next week. Thanks.
From: Guangliang gpan@apnic.net Date: Monday, December 14, 2020 at 2:51 AM To: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Thanks John!
Kind regards, Guangliang ==========
From: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2020 2:44 AM To: Guangliang Pan gpan@apnic.net; IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Sounds like a good idea, let me do that and get this sent out. Thanks.
From: Guangliang <gpan@apnic.netmailto:gpan@apnic.net> Date: Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks, Guangliang =========
From: rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> On Behalf Of John Sweeting Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM To: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John,
Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments.
Thanks,
Hollis
On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John and Tommy,
I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that.
Thoughts?
Hollis
On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C2463da709b554e35b0f608d8954f57e6%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C1%7C637423515747180020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FMUe8C9DmxM9zoipaC7pSB0xTnClh4qrEgf6hG8ROMI%3D&reserved=0
Much appreciated. Thanks John!
Kind regards, Nurani
On 15 Dec 2020, at 18:23, John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net wrote:
I will be sending out the matrix with 2020 information sometime next week. Thanks.
From: Guangliang <gpan@apnic.net mailto:gpan@apnic.net> Date: Monday, December 14, 2020 at 2:51 AM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.net mailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.net mailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Thanks John!
Kind regards, Guangliang ==========
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.net mailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2020 2:44 AM To: Guangliang Pan <gpan@apnic.net mailto:gpan@apnic.net>; IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.net mailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Sounds like a good idea, let me do that and get this sent out. Thanks.
From: Guangliang <gpan@apnic.net mailto:gpan@apnic.net> Date: Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.net mailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.net mailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks, Guangliang =========
From: rc-bounces@nro.net mailto:rc-bounces@nro.net <rc-bounces@nro.net mailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> On Behalf Of John Sweeting Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM To: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.net mailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.net mailto:hollisk@arin.net> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.net mailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.net mailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.net mailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.net mailto:hollisk@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.net mailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee <louie@louie.net mailto:louie@louie.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.net mailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.net mailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.net mailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.net mailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John, Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information. Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments. Thanks, Hollis On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.net <mailto:jsweeting@arin.net>> wrote: I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results. On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.net <mailto:hollisk@arin.net>> wrote: John and Tommy, I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing? I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that. Thoughts? Hollis On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.net <mailto:jsweeting@arin.net>> wrote: Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks. On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.net <mailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.net <mailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote: Dear colleagues, At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments. We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly. German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report. I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net mailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C2463da709b554e35b0f608d8954f57e6%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C1%7C637423515747180020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FMUe8C9DmxM9zoipaC7pSB0xTnClh4qrEgf6hG8ROMI%3D&reserved=0_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net mailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
All,
Please find attached a draft for the table. This should hold all the information but please provide comments.
Thanks, John S.
From: rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 12:23 PM To: Guangliang gpan@apnic.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
I will be sending out the matrix with 2020 information sometime next week. Thanks.
From: Guangliang gpan@apnic.net Date: Monday, December 14, 2020 at 2:51 AM To: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Thanks John!
Kind regards, Guangliang ==========
From: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2020 2:44 AM To: Guangliang Pan gpan@apnic.net; IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Sounds like a good idea, let me do that and get this sent out. Thanks.
From: Guangliang <gpan@apnic.netmailto:gpan@apnic.net> Date: Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks, Guangliang =========
From: rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> On Behalf Of John Sweeting Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM To: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John,
Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments.
Thanks,
Hollis
On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John and Tommy,
I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that.
Thoughts?
Hollis
On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C2463da709b554e35b0f608d8954f57e6%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C1%7C637423515747180020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FMUe8C9DmxM9zoipaC7pSB0xTnClh4qrEgf6hG8ROMI%3D&reserved=0
This is great. I have a suggestion(s) along the lines of simplification and boiling down to a point.
Appendix 1 - I'd suggest instead of response and implementation time that the marker could be "SLA" and Met or Un Met. A notes field could capture a circumstance of a missed SLA or even an addendum. I feel like there should be a lot of detail around a missed SLA and an met SLA should be just another day in the office. Notes may not be big enough or functional enough.
Service Assessment - Maybe you could consider using a check market for acknowledged like Implemented and Accuracy
Duplicating detail contained in the actual IANA report is not an efficient use of RIR or Secretariat time IMHO and from a community perspective a dashboard is the most desired and for those who want intricate detail wec an point them at the IANA report.
This looks pretty good over all. Thank you.
I'd also suggest that instead of 100% that if the SLA is met or not its a binary: SLA Met or SLA Not Met. I don't see a requirement for you to note the implementation times other than SLA and I think if the SLA is met and a general description of the SLA 92 days) is provided that is reasonable.
Since
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:29 AM John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net wrote:
All,
Please find attached a draft for the table. This should hold all the information but please provide comments.
Thanks,
John S.
*From: *rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of John Sweeting < jsweeting@arin.net> *Date: *Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 12:23 PM *To: *Guangliang gpan@apnic.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net *Subject: *Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
I will be sending out the matrix with 2020 information sometime next week. Thanks.
*From: *Guangliang gpan@apnic.net *Date: *Monday, December 14, 2020 at 2:51 AM *To: *John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net *Subject: *RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Thanks John!
Kind regards,
Guangliang
==========
*From:* John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 December 2020 2:44 AM *To:* Guangliang Pan gpan@apnic.net; IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net *Subject:* Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Sounds like a good idea, let me do that and get this sent out. Thanks.
*From: *Guangliang gpan@apnic.net *Date: *Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM *To: *John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net *Subject: *RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks,
Guangliang
=========
*From:* rc-bounces@nro.net rc-bounces@nro.net *On Behalf Of *John Sweeting *Sent:* Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM *To:* IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net *Subject:* [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
*From: *Hollis Kara hollisk@arin.net *Date: *Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM *To: *John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.net
*Subject: *Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
*From: *John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net *Date: *Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM *To: *Hollis Kara hollisk@arin.net, Tommy Baldwin tbaldwin@arin.net *Subject: *FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks,
John
*From: *Louie Lee louie@louie.net *Date: *Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM *To: *John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net *Cc: *IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net *Subject: *Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net wrote:
All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" hollisk@arin.net wrote:
John, Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - thatwould be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make furtheradjustments.
Thanks, Hollis On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.net> wrote: John and Tommy, I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a moredigestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn'tbother with that.
Thoughts? Hollis On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.net>wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what theRIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf ofNurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues, At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RCreport, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate thereport internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have nowincorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully finalversion of the IANA RC 2020 report.
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C2463da709b554e35b0f608d8954f57e6%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C1%7C637423515747180020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FMUe8C9DmxM9zoipaC7pSB0xTnClh4qrEgf6hG8ROMI%3D&reserved=0
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
From: rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Date: Monday, December 21, 2020 at 11:28 AM To: Guangliang gpan@apnic.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
All,
Please find attached a draft for the table. This should hold all the information but please provide comments.
Thanks, John S.
From: rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 12:23 PM To: Guangliang gpan@apnic.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
I will be sending out the matrix with 2020 information sometime next week. Thanks.
From: Guangliang gpan@apnic.net Date: Monday, December 14, 2020 at 2:51 AM To: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Thanks John!
Kind regards, Guangliang ==========
From: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2020 2:44 AM To: Guangliang Pan gpan@apnic.net; IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Sounds like a good idea, let me do that and get this sent out. Thanks.
From: Guangliang <gpan@apnic.netmailto:gpan@apnic.net> Date: Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: RE: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Many thanks for improving the table and the format looks good to me.
If no RIRs will request additional resources from IANA in Dec, do you mind putting the 2020 data into the table? We can then have the table for review in January meeting.
Thanks, Guangliang =========
From: rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net> On Behalf Of John Sweeting Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:08 PM To: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: [IANA-RC] Final IANA RC report
This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net>, Tommy Baldwin <tbaldwin@arin.netmailto:tbaldwin@arin.net> Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee <louie@louie.netmailto:louie@louie.net> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee <rc@nro.netmailto:rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John,
Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments.
Thanks,
Hollis
On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John and Tommy,
I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that.
Thoughts?
Hollis
On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rchttps://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nro.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C2463da709b554e35b0f608d8954f57e6%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C1%7C637423515747180020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FMUe8C9DmxM9zoipaC7pSB0xTnClh4qrEgf6hG8ROMI%3D&reserved=0
participants (4)
-
Guangliang Pan -
John Sweeting -
Martin Hannigan -
Nurani Nimpuno