This one incorporated the change suggested by Louie Lee. Thanks.
From: Hollis Kara hollisk@arin.net Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:18 PM To: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net, Tommy Baldwin tbaldwin@arin.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi John,
Passing this back to you. I am not sure who assembles the report, so if you need this in a different format, let us know.
Thanks,
Hollis
From: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM To: Hollis Kara hollisk@arin.net, Tommy Baldwin tbaldwin@arin.net Subject: FW: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Hi Hollis,
Some input and kudos from Louie. I believe that would be an easy change.
Thanks, John
From: Louie Lee louie@louie.net Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:53 PM To: John Sweeting jsweeting@arin.net Cc: IANA Numbering Services Review Committee rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] FW: Final IANA RC report
Love the format. Thank you.
The only suggestion for improvement is maybe to change the "Received from" table heading text to "Requested by". My initial read of "Received from" was confusing to me until I remembered that we are talking about the request and not the allocation. (Being it's the RIR's matrix, I was thinking primarily from the viewpoint of the RIRs and not from IANA.) Perhaps the "Requested by" heading can avoid this confusion without changing the meaning.
Thanks to Hollis and the ARIN Comms team.
Louie
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:09 PM John Sweeting <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote: All,
Following up on the action item from our last meeting ARIN's Comms department has suggested the attached format. Please provide your input and/or thoughts.
Thanks, John S.
On 4/6/20, 4:34 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John,
Tommy got these put together. They don't include the linkages - that would be best handled when this format is put into the report by the Secretary. Overall, I think this makes it a little easier to process the information.
Let us know if you get feedback and we need to make further adjustments.
Thanks,
Hollis
On 4/3/20, 6:11 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
I think so but let's get a full draft that I can run by the other 4 RIR staff participants. The main concern was ease of reading the results.
On 4/2/20, 2:06 PM, "Hollis Kara" <hollisk@arin.netmailto:hollisk@arin.net> wrote:
John and Tommy,
I took a stab at trying to arrange the information in a more digestible manner. Once we work out the kinks, Tommy can create prettier tables. Does this address the concerns? Is there anything missing?
I think the SLA segment is clear as it stands, so I didn't bother with that.
Thoughts?
Hollis
On 4/2/20, 12:57 PM, "John Sweeting" <jsweeting@arin.netmailto:jsweeting@arin.net> wrote:
Here you go, the matrix is appendix 1. That is what the RIRs are responsible for putting together. Let me know what questions you have and I will try to answer or we might have to jump on a quick call. Thanks.
On 3/7/20, 5:23 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.netmailto:rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.netmailto:nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last IANA RC call, we finalised the IANA RC report, but it was still missing the URL for the archived public comments.
We set a timeline for ourselves to circulate the report internally on Wednesday, and if there were no further comments, publish the report on Friday. However, it took a little longer than anticipated for the secretariat to publish the comment and share the URL, so we will need to adjust the timeline slightly.
German sent us the URL yesterday which I have now incorporated into the report.
I have now attached the latest, and hopefully final version of the IANA RC 2020 report.
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.netmailto:Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc