Nurain,
Thank you for the clarification.
Standing by to meet and jump into action once the RC has a draft matrix and performance standard metrics.
Glad to know the lack of a recent RC meeting is not the long pole in the tent.
__Jason
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Nurani Nimpuno nurani@nimblebits.net wrote:
Thank you for this Jason. No we do not have a draft matrix. However I know that the RIRs have thought a little bit about this even though they haven't sent us a matrix as such.
This is why I will follow up with them about this first step. After that, I agree that we should review it (and approve it).
Nurani
On 14 Sep 2017, at 16:34, Jason Schiller jschiller@google.com wrote:
Nurani,
I got the impression from your email that the performance matrix is complete, and we have a performance standard metrics.
Assuming that is the case can we circulate that info to the RC (Or re-circulate it if it was already sent and i missed it) so that we can review it, and meet to discuss it.
I think next steps would be:
- approve the matrix and
- approve the performance standard metrics
- Look at available IANA data reported 3.a. ensure there are no gaps of metrics that are not being measured 3.b. ensure we understand and are comfortable with how the metric is
being measured 4. start assembling a preliminary report
___Jason
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Nurani Nimpuno nurani@nimblebits.net wrote:
Hi German and all,
These late minutes show that we are not following the timeline we set out for ourselves in May.
However, it is also not clear from the minutes what the agreed timeline actually were.
NN asked ND when the IANA RC could expect a draft structure of the RIR
report.
I am fairly certain that ND gave us an indicated time for this, but the minutes do not seem have recorded ND’s response. This makes it a little difficult to set the rest of our workplan, as we agreed that the RC’s work would follow the receipt from the RIRs on a draft structure of the RIR report.
I know that the RIR have done work on this, so I will follow up with the RIR RC members on this draft, as well as an adjusted timeline to propose to the group.
Kind regards,
Nurani
On 4 Sep 2017, at 15:20, German Valdez german@apnic.net wrote:
HI
I realized my email with the minutes of May Teleconference got caught
many weeks ago in the mailing list filter as it was sent from an account not subscribed in the list. This is fixed now. Apologies for this mistake
German
IANA Review Committee Teleconference 11 May 2017, 12:00 PM UTC
Participants
IANA Review Committee Members
AFRINIC Omo Oaiya OO Douglas Onyango DO
APNIC Brajesh Jain BJ Tomohiro Fujisaki TF George Kuo GK
ARIN Louie Lee LL Jason Schiller -JS - Co Chair Nate Davis ND
LACNIC Nicolas Antoniello NA Ernesto Majo EM
RIPE Filiz Yilmaz FY Nurani Nimpuno NN - Chair Andrew de la Haye AH
Apologies Madhvi Gokool
Observers Izumi Okutani IO Jorge Villa JV
Secretariat German Valdez - GV
IANA RC
0 Welcome 1 Roll Call 2 Minutes Review 15 March 2017 3 Review Open Actions 4 IANA Review Committee Operating Procedures 5 IANA Performance Report Structure & Schedule 6 Next Meeting 7 AOB 8 Adjourn
0 Welcome
NN welcomed the participants and started the meeting at 12:03 PM
1 Roll Call
Record of participation is at the top of this minutes.
GV noted that Madhvi Gokool sent her apologies in advance of the call.
2 Minutes Review 15 March 2017
NN asked for any comments for the March minutes.
No comments received.
NN asked if there were any objections for the publication of the
minutes.
No objections received.
NN called the minutes approved.
3 Review Open Actions
Action Item 20170315-01 JS and NN to discuss the production date of the
report with the NRO EC for their decision and then share this with the RC
COMPLETED
JS reported that they agreed with the NRO EC in a yearly report format
from January through December. JS said that the NRO EC would like to see the report by mid year. JS added that the first report would include the period started with the signing of the IANA contract.
At this point BJ asked if there were observers on the cal.
NN said that the IANA RC teleconferences are open for observers.
GV reported that Izumi Okutani, Jorge Villa and Ernest Majo were
observers for this teleconference
Action Item 20170315-02 JS and NN to amend the length of the Chair and
Co-Chair’s term noting that if there is a change before the end of the term, the new Chair or Co-Chair will serve for the balance of that term - 2.1.5 and 2.1.6
COMPLETED
Action Item 20170315-03 Committee to review the proceedings and provide
comments in two weeks.
CLOSED
Action Item 20170315-04 ND and RC RIR staff members to track status of
the production of the performance standard metrics and provide regular updates.
IN PROGRESS
ND reported that the IANA PTI and NRO EC agreed in a report format
considering the operational requirements included in the section 4.3 of the contract. ND added that there are other reporting requirements that still needs to be developed like the cases of splitting /8 for transfer reasons.
BJ asked ND if they have a performance standard metrics draft plan to
be shared with the IANA RC
ND said that the RIR staff were working on the plan and it’d be
available for the IANA RC once there is an agreement from each RIR perspective.
Action Item 20170315-05 FY to look how community engagement can be
included in the operating procedures with a light touch (that it will come naturally as being members of the RC)
COMPLETED
FY reported that this was included in the last version of the IANA RC
operating procedures.
4 IANA Review Committee Operating Procedures
NN asked if there were any comments or concerns in the last changes in
the text of the operating procedures.
BJ suggested that at section 7 “Amending Operating Procedures”, any
intention of amend should be included as part of the agenda meeting in advance.
NN said that at this point she want to reach consensus on the operating
procedures. NN confirmed to BJ that she was taking on board his suggestion.
NN asked if last proposed changes in the text of the section 5.2
“Community Feedback” were acceptable.
FY said she was ok with the text.
NN suggested to adopt the procedures as there were no comments or
objection.
BJ asked about his suggestion to be included as part of the operating
procedures.
JS suggested the next text to be added to section 7…”When amended in a
meeting, there must be 24 hours prior notice of the intent to amend the operating procedures.”
NN reminded that most of the committee work should be done in the
mailing list. NN advised to be careful to have procedures that would add more meetings to the committee.
FY asked JS if amendment to the procedures can be made in the list.
JS considered that amendments could be made in the IANA RC list.
NN moved to adopt the procedures including the new text to section 7
based on BJ request.
NN asked that any further comments can be sent to the list.
5 IANA Performance Report Structure & Schedule
NN asked ND when the IANA RC could expect a draft structure of the RIR
report.
after consulting EM, AH and GK; ND suggested 60 days for the RIR to
present a draft report to the IANA RC
NN suggested once the draft report is presented the IANA RC takes 2
weeks to review it and then meet to confirm the template to be used for the community consultation.
6 Next Meeting
Based on the delivery of the RIR report, NN suggested that next meeting
should be to discuss the RIR report and their own IANA RC format report. NN suggested that next meeting could be in August.
7 AOB
No other business was discussed
8 Adjourn
NN adjourned the meeting at 13:05 PM UTC
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.com|571-266-0006 <(571)%20266-0006>
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc