Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
All,
The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the Community Agreement.
The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square brackets should appear in the document.
This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following text:
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.
If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
Greg
All:
One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The preamble should read:
[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of the names community]
Thanks!
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com wrote:
All,
The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the Community Agreement.
The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square brackets should appear in the document.
This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following text:
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.
If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
Greg
I have made this change. I assume no change to the signature block at this point?
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM To: iana-ipr@nro.net Cc: "Flanagan, Sharon" sflanagan@sidley.com, Client cwg-client@icann.org, "Gregory, Holly" holly.gregory@sidley.com, Joshua Hofheimer jhofheimer@sidley.com Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
All:
One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The preamble should read:
[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of the names community]
Thanks!
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com wrote:
All,
The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the Community Agreement.
The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square brackets should appear in the document.
This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following text:
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.
If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
Greg
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Good question. I would make the parallel change to the signature block.
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jorge Contreras contreraslegal@att.net wrote:
I have made this change. I assume no change to the signature block at this point?
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Greg Shatan < gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM To: iana-ipr@nro.net Cc: "Flanagan, Sharon" sflanagan@sidley.com, Client < cwg-client@icann.org>, "Gregory, Holly" holly.gregory@sidley.com, Joshua Hofheimer jhofheimer@sidley.com Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
All:
One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The preamble should read:
[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of the names community]
Thanks!
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com wrote:
All,
The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the Community Agreement.
The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square brackets should appear in the document.
This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following text:
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.
If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
Greg
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
I don’t think you need to do it in the signature block
HOLLY J. GREGORY Partner and Co-Chair, Global Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP +1 212 839 5853 holly.gregory@sidley.commailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com
From: Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:30 PM To: Jorge Contreras Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net; Flanagan, Sharon; Client; Gregory, Holly; Hofheimer, Joshua T. Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
Good question. I would make the parallel change to the signature block.
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.netmailto:contreraslegal@att.net> wrote: I have made this change. I assume no change to the signature block at this point?
Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.netmailto:contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
From: <iana-ipr-bounces@nro.netmailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.commailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM To: <iana-ipr@nro.netmailto:iana-ipr@nro.net> Cc: "Flanagan, Sharon" <sflanagan@sidley.commailto:sflanagan@sidley.com>, Client <cwg-client@icann.orgmailto:cwg-client@icann.org>, "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory@sidley.commailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com>, Joshua Hofheimer <jhofheimer@sidley.commailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
All:
One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The preamble should read:
[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of the names community]
Thanks!
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.commailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote: All,
The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the Community Agreement.
The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square brackets should appear in the document.
This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following text:
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.
If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
Greg
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.netmailto:Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-iprhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nro.net_mailman_listinfo_iana-2Dipr&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=C9aDiv8Kh2B53CQnp0rIIUQY7ma5dJiThLWn5T7zKAY&s=M8quUNHoqWVtmKeGN2x1ajx8gI7lUPPnzKGk_e840U8&e=
**************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
****************************************************************************************************
I see now that all of the signature blocks are still essentially "generic" and do not identify entities (except the block the IETF Trust). As such, the names community block should remain generic as well. The versions that Jorge sent around about half-hour ago are set up that way, so we should be good to go.
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Gregory, Holly holly.gregory@sidley.com wrote:
I don’t think you need to do it in the signature block
*HOLLY J. GREGORY* Partner and Co-Chair, Global Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice
*SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP *+1 212 839 5853 holly.gregory@sidley.com
*From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:30 PM *To:* Jorge Contreras *Cc:* iana-ipr@nro.net; Flanagan, Sharon; Client; Gregory, Holly; Hofheimer, Joshua T.
*Subject:* Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
Good question. I would make the parallel change to the signature block.
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jorge Contreras contreraslegal@att.net wrote:
I have made this change. I assume no change to the signature block at this point?
Jorge L. Contreras
Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
Washington, DC 20036
contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
*From: *iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Greg Shatan < gregshatanipc@gmail.com> *Date: *Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM *To: *iana-ipr@nro.net *Cc: *"Flanagan, Sharon" sflanagan@sidley.com, Client < cwg-client@icann.org>, "Gregory, Holly" holly.gregory@sidley.com, Joshua Hofheimer jhofheimer@sidley.com *Subject: *Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
All:
One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The preamble should read:
[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of the names community]
Thanks!
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com wrote:
All,
The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the Community Agreement.
The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square brackets should appear in the document.
This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following text:
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.
If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
Greg
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nro.net_mailman_listinfo_iana-2Dipr&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=C9aDiv8Kh2B53CQnp0rIIUQY7ma5dJiThLWn5T7zKAY&s=M8quUNHoqWVtmKeGN2x1ajx8gI7lUPPnzKGk_e840U8&e=
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
Yes, and they're already posted.
A
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:10:21PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
I see now that all of the signature blocks are still essentially "generic" and do not identify entities (except the block the IETF Trust). As such, the names community block should remain generic as well. The versions that Jorge sent around about half-hour ago are set up that way, so we should be good to go.
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Gregory, Holly holly.gregory@sidley.com wrote:
I don’t think you need to do it in the signature block
*HOLLY J. GREGORY* Partner and Co-Chair, Global Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice
*SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP *+1 212 839 5853 holly.gregory@sidley.com
*From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:30 PM *To:* Jorge Contreras *Cc:* iana-ipr@nro.net; Flanagan, Sharon; Client; Gregory, Holly; Hofheimer, Joshua T.
*Subject:* Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
Good question. I would make the parallel change to the signature block.
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jorge Contreras contreraslegal@att.net wrote:
I have made this change. I assume no change to the signature block at this point?
Jorge L. Contreras
Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
Washington, DC 20036
contreraslegal@att.net
The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
*From: *iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Greg Shatan < gregshatanipc@gmail.com> *Date: *Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM *To: *iana-ipr@nro.net *Cc: *"Flanagan, Sharon" sflanagan@sidley.com, Client < cwg-client@icann.org>, "Gregory, Holly" holly.gregory@sidley.com, Joshua Hofheimer jhofheimer@sidley.com *Subject: *Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
All:
One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The preamble should read:
[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of the names community]
Thanks!
Greg
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com wrote:
All,
The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the Community Agreement.
The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square brackets should appear in the document.
This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following text:
CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.
If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
Greg
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nro.net_mailman_listinfo_iana-2Dipr&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=C9aDiv8Kh2B53CQnp0rIIUQY7ma5dJiThLWn5T7zKAY&s=M8quUNHoqWVtmKeGN2x1ajx8gI7lUPPnzKGk_e840U8&e=
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
On 11 Aug 2016, at 21:42, Greg Shatan gregshatanipc@gmail.com wrote:
All:
One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The preamble should read:
[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of the names community]
I think that’s fine.
Alan Barrett
participants (6)
-
Alan Barrett -
Andrew Sullivan -
Greg Shatan -
Gregory, Holly -
Jari Arkko -
Jorge Contreras