We received 7 public comments, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment. See http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/ http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/ .
One comment was a comment about the transition in general: http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/0... http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/000002.html . I do not believe there is anything actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment.
All of the other comments are supportive of the IANA IPR agreements.
Thus, I do not believe we have any edits to make to the agreements as a result of the public comments received. If anyone disagrees, please respond to this thread.
I’ll send a separate email with an overall update and next steps.
Thanks, Alissa
On 15 Sep 2016, at 19:31, Alissa Cooper alissa@cooperw.in wrote:
We received 7 public comments, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment. See http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/ .
One comment was a comment about the transition in general: http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/0... . I do not believe there is anything actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment.
All of the other comments are supportive of the IANA IPR agreements.
Thus, I do not believe we have any edits to make to the agreements as a result of the public comments received. If anyone disagrees, please respond to this thread.
I agree with this assessment.
Alan Barrett
participants (2)
-
Alan Barrett
-
Alissa Cooper