Actually PTI would have no employees, just allocated pieces of ICANN employees.

On Sunday, March 6, 2016, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks! Makes sense now. Darn autocorrect. Keeps trying to change my name to Satan....
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
Pacific Telecommunication Council.

But that was an autocorrected "PTI".

Sorry!
On 6 March 2016 8:51:25 pm GMT+00:00, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
What does "PTC" stand for?
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
Our assumption is that ICANN will subcontract the Iana number functions to PTI. So PTC staff will be doing the work.
Paul
On 6 March 2016 8:15:54 pm GMT+00:00, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm curious to know the understanding of the RIRs and IETF about what is going into PTI. The ICANN Budget just posted for comment shows only the "naming functions" going into PTI, while the "numbers functions" and "protocol parameter functions" will remain within ICANN.

Since IANA staff is cross-functional, this means that the IANA staff will be allocated in part to ICANN and in part to PTI based on what they do (e.g., employee A will be 30% PTI, 70% ICANN and employee B will be 50% PTI, 70% ICANN). As such, PTI would almost certainly have no full-time employees.

Is this your understanding of the plan?

Thanks!

Greg
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
--
Paul Wilson
Director General, APNIC
--
Paul Wilson
Director General, APNIC