21 Mar
2016
21 Mar
'16
10:42 p.m.
Hi,
We said 3 weeks in our meeting, so that was the date I gave the IETF counsel.
--
Andrew Sullivan
Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 07:59, Jonathan Robinson jrobinson@afilias.info wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew, Thanks Alan,
>
> Do you have an ETA for the reviewed documents in order for us to make the best decision on the way forward here?
>
> Jonathan & Lise
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Barrett [mailto:alan.barrett@afrinic.net]
> Sent: 18 March 2016 18:18
> To: iana-ipr@nro.net
> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] PDF document for review
>
>
>> On 18 Mar 2016, at 15:02, Jonathan Robinson jrobinson@afilias.info wrote:
>>
>> Alan / Andrew,
>>
>> Lise & I were seeking to be efficient rather that slow things down.
>> The concern is that three parallel reviews produce three outcomes
>> which may not gel together or even contradict one another.
>>
>> Therefore, it seemed logical to get one (or two as it turns out)
>> reviews completed prior so that the following one/s build on that
>> rather than potentially conflict with it.
>>
>> Trust that makes sense?
>
> No, sorry, I can’t think of a scenario where reviews in series will result in less overall effort than reviews in parallel. It’s too late anyway; the reviews are already proceeding in parallel.
>
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr@nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr@nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr