Apologies for a late answer. This is fine to me too.

Best,

Lise

On 12 Sep 2016, at 22:30, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

Apologies for the slow turnaround on this.

They seem fine to me too.

Would be good to get and additional OK from Lise and/or Greg if possible.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Jorge Contreras [mailto:contreraslegal@att.net]
Sent: 09 September 2016 20:37
To: iana-ipr@nro.net
Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised Assignment and License Agreements

 

All – as discussed during this week’s call, the IETF Trust and ICANN have been resolving their remaining issues in the Assignment Agreement and License Agreement.  I have attached for your review slightly modified versions of these documents.  The changes are as follows:

 

ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT

 

Sec. 6.1 – indemnification term agreed at 3 years

 

LICENSE AGREEMENT

 

Sec. 4.3.c – ICANN agrees to cover cost of ongoing enforcement actions existing as of the Effective Date.

 

Sec. 7.4 – arbitration details resolved (3 arbitrators if parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator; venue of arbitration to be NY)

 

Ex. D, Item 5 – clarify that use of ‘IANA’ as an entity name is permitted in archived RFCs and other documents.

 

As discussed, if these changes are acceptable to the RIR and CWG, we will post the above changes as public comments from the Trust.

 

Best regards,

Jorge

 

Jorge L. Contreras

Contreras Legal Strategy LLC

1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710

Washington, DC 20036

contreraslegal@att.net

 

The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.

 

_______________________________________________
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr

_______________________________________________
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr