Jorge,

I saw that. That's inconsistent with the Proposed Principal Terms of IANA IPR Agreements, which contemplates the license running to ICANN, with the right to sublicense to PTI. We'll need to fix that in the next draft before we turn that back to this list. Since I understand that you had no comments on the Proposed Principal Terms document, that shouldn't be an issue.

Best regards,

Greg

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:

Greg – just a point of clarification: the License Agreement that we distributed runs from the Trust to PTI.

Jorge

From: <iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 4:01 PM
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Cc: <iana-ipr@nro.net>
Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] ICANN participation in iana-ipr list

Ray,

Good point. I think it makes more sense to discuss the CA only among the parties to the CA (the operational communities and the Trust).

On the other hand, the operational community reps need to be part of the discussion of the license agreement (which I think will run to ICANN and not direct to PTI) and the IPR assignment.

Greg

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote:
Alan,

I asked ICANN about this and they confirmed this list below.

But let’s discuss:

The Communities are discussing Agreements with the Trust,
the Community Agreement (CA) and the License Agreement to PTI.

The Trust is also discussing the IPR Assignment to the Trust.
And, of course, will need to discuss the License Agreement to the
PTI.

Is there clear desire on everyone’s part that you’d like to
invite ICANN to the CA discussion?

Ray

Akram Atallah akram.atallah@icann.org
Sam Eisner Samantha.Eisner@icann.org
Trang Nguyen trang.nguyen@icann.org
John Jeffrey john.jeffrey@icann.org
Elise Gerich elise.gerich@icann.org

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> wrote:
>
> While we were discussion the draft principal terms document, we didn’t have any ICANN representatives in the iana-ipr group. Now that we are moving on to discussion the agreements, I think we should have some ICANN participation, including both legal and other staff.
>
> Who would be the right people?
>
> I’d suggest that any ICANN people who want to be involved end a request to German Valdez <german@nro.net>.
>
> Alan Barrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr@nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr

_______________________________________________
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr

_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr