26 Jul
2016
26 Jul
'16
5:38 a.m.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:10:02PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
I think you're missing the original reason that this meeting was requested by CWG, which was to have a call between "IETF Trustees and Names reps" to go over a number of questions/points of information that the Names reps and counsel would like to clarify with representatives of the IETF Trustees.
So,
0) Issues raised by CWG?
The difficulty, of course, is that we don't actually _have_ that list, so it'll be hard to produce answers. Any clue how much later today? I had some tentative plans for end-of-workday that I could just insert now so I could review those issues later, but if "later" is "20:00 EDT" it'll probably be too late -- my body is still convinced I'm in Germany.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com