Dear all,
Please find below the notes and chat of today’s IANA IPR call.
Recordings of the meeting will be posted under the Meetings and Work Session section of the Implementation page found here:
https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation
Thanks,
Nathalie.
IANA IPR Follow-Up Call on Thursday, 18 August @ 17:00 UTC 
Participants:
Alan Barrett
Alissa Cooper
Andrew Sullivan
Greg Shatan
Jari Arkko
Jonathan Robinson
Josh Hofheimer (Sidley)
Ray Pelletier
Russ Housley
Samantha Eisner
Ted Hardie
Trang Nguyen
Yael Resnick (Sidley)
Brenda Brewer
Nathalie Vergnolle
Yuko Green
Notes:
Introduction
No public comments received yet.
1. Outstanding items in the community agreement
·  Names community signatory: 
            - ICANN currently the front runner. CWG actively exploring this option.
            - Discussed if/how this could affect other parties/other parts of the agreement
            - Point will be further discussed once it has been further looked into by CWG/Sidley
2. Outstanding items in the license agreement
·  Definition of Names Community (1.24)
            - Currently TBD in the agreement
            - Item being discussed by CWG
Action: CWG to provide definition when it becomes available
·  Arbitration items: number of arbitrators and location (7.4)
            - Item being discussed
3. Timing for CCG member appointments
·  NRO expecting to be ready by end of September, when the agreement will be signed
·  IETF expressed concern that there may not be sufficent time to run the normal process for selection of CCG members, and an interim solution may be necessary
·  CWG working towards having a solution in place before end of September
4. Approach to establishment of CCG operating procedures
·  Cf. art 2.4 of Community agreement
5. Future call scheduling
ACTION (Staff): Weekly calls to be scheduled for next 3 weeks (preferably after CWG calls)
Chat:
  Yuko Green:Hi everybody, welcome to IANA IPR follow-up call!
  Jonathan Robinson:We do not have scroll rights on the doc in the Adobe
  Yuko Green:I just released the scroll rights
  Jonathan Robinson:Thank you Yuko
  Greg Shatan:Sorry to be delayed.
  Greg Shatan:TBD has been incorrporated as Technical Buyers of Domains, Inc.
  Alissa Cooper:lulz
  Jonathan Robinson:@Greg. Good point. I had converged Names Community and Names Services in my thinking.
  Josh Hofheimer (Sidley):There is nothing for the Names Community to sign in this document.
  Greg Shatan:Understood, but we still need to say who they are....
  Greg Shatan:or who we are.
  Greg Shatan:Since it's not a notice that needs to come from a signatory party, there's a little more flexibility in saying who taht is.
  Alan Barrett:how wrong would it be to say Names Community = {some list of ICANN subsets, including at least ccNSO + gNSO}
  Jonathan Robinson:@Alan. Discussion along those lines took place today but it is not settled e.g. there are a reasonable number of ccTLDs outside of the ccNSO
  Greg Shatan:Whoever it is, is only the messenger.
  Ted Hardie:@Jonathan would it be fair to say that they are "that portion of the Name Community that picks the representives for CCG"?
  Ted Hardie:Name/Names
  Jonathan Robinson:@Ted. Possibly but work in progress
  andrew sullivan:Ok here
  andrew sullivan:Yeah, we could definitely do an interim thing in time
  andrew sullivan:I agree
  Ted Hardie:Sorry, the mic claims it is live; I will log out and long back in
  andrew sullivan:I think that my main point was in line with what Jari is suggesting
  andrew sullivan:It doesn't seem to me that there'll be any thing actually to do on day 1
  Jonathan Robinson:@Alissa. Got it. Thank-you
  Ted Hardie:I think interim is the wrong formulation.
  Ted Hardie:I think we can make appointments, and set deadlines for new appointments
  Greg Shatan:"Initial"?
  andrew sullivan:we don't need to set such deadlines, though
  andrew sullivan:because the communities can remove and replace as they want
  Ted Hardie:If need be, I believe the IETF/IAB can do that.
  Jari Arkko:fwiw I am happy with the interim approach, certainly could be done from IETF side.
  Jonathan Robinson:Andrew faded for me too
  andrew sullivan:Sorry.  My point was just that I thought we'd decided this in
  andrew sullivan:the earlier principles discussion
  andrew sullivan:and I am not sure why we want to reopen it
  andrew sullivan:none here
  Jonathan Robinson:OK with me
  Ray Pelletier:concur
  Ted Hardie:No objections
  Greg Shatan:Indubitably.
  Jonathan Robinson:Thursday this type of time typically follows CWG meeting so names are "up to date"
  Jonathan Robinson:Thanks all
  Ray Pelletier:at first meeting CCG to adopt procedures
  andrew sullivan:thanks!  Bye all
  Ted Hardie:Thanks, bye all
  Alan Barrett:thanks