To all, I identified one requested change to the Community Agreement that, in the flurry of revisions in the last few days, did not make it into the document.  The relevant Section is 5.2 (Withdrawal of an Operational Community).  The revision is attached here in Track Changes, and accounts for the fact that in the future, a community may want to change its representative “Operational Community.” This may be a straight withdrawal, which is contemplated in the Agreement, or may be a switch to another Party.  This last part is not picked up and language has been added to address.  Jorge communicated that he has no objection to the proposed text.

 

I am attaching the redline here, but will follow in another email with clean and PDF copies.  I am including all six documents again, just for ease of forwarding.  There are no changes to the License or the Assignment Agreement.

 

Thank you,

Josh

 

 

 

Can we get Word documents as well as the PDFs?  I expect to get this request from people in the CWG, and I'd rather be able to meet it than say no.

 

Thanks.

 

Greg

 

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:

Ok. I will do that and the yellow highlighting.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 10, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 10, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, I thought this was the form we chose on the call today.  I'm ok
>> with [TBD before signing].  Would that do?
>
> Yes, that works.
> Alissa
>
>>
>> A
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:15:32PM -0700, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> I think the [TBD] in 6.1 of the assignment agreement needs a footnote of explanation. Commenters will not know whether the parties intent to sign the agreement as-is and decide on the value of X afterward, or whether the parties intend to specify X before signing.
>>>
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>>> On Aug 10, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Here are the documents.
>>>>
>>>> The license still says something about "things highlighted in yellow"
>>>> but I think they've all been changed to bold.  Jorge had to go, but I
>>>> told him and presumably he can regenerate later.
>>>>
>>>> A
>>>>
>>>> ----- Forwarded message from Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> -----
>>>>
>>>> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:30:48 -0600
>>>> From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net>
>>>> To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
>>>> Subject: Final documents
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Sullivan
>>>> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>>>> <Community-Agreement_-_08-10-2016_final_clean.pdf>
>>>> <License_Agreement_IANA_IPR_08-10-2016_final_clean.pdf>
>>>> <Assignment_Agreement_08-10-2016_final_clean.pdf>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>>>> Iana-ipr@nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>>> Iana-ipr@nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>> Iana-ipr@nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr@nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr


_______________________________________________
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr