It probably makes more sense for ICANN to comment on this draft first (and quickly), before the other communities do (if at all). After a brief review, I did not see anything that would make this clearly deficient for its intended purpose.
Greg
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
Hi,
I forwarded this once before, but I'm nervous that I might have forwarded the wrong version -- I _did_ forward the wrong version of something else recently, after all. So I'm forwarding this again, just so that we're clear about what we're talking about.
This is really a proposal for an agreement between the Trust and ICANN, so in principle it shouldn't really require much in the way of attention by people here. But we want to be transparent and, as you can see, this is pretty straightforward.
We're a little concerned that we're having a hard time getting responses from our correspondents on the ICANN staff, so if anyone has the opportunty to tickle them on this topic we'd appreciate it.
Best regards,
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr