I don't think the Principal Terms were put out for ICANN Public Comment (though there were brought back to the CWG), so we'll need to be careful in how we phrase that....

Greg

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
Thanks, looks good to me as well. The only thing that I wonder is whether the fact that there was earlier work and posting of principal terms should be mentioned. I know from the IETF community side that would probably be helpful context.

Jari

> On 8.8.2016, at 22.07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's a draft note for the solitication of public comments.  Have at it :)
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> <draft-pub-comment-solicit.20160808a-dist.txt>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr@nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr


_______________________________________________
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr