Andrew,
I think you're missing the original reason that this meeting was requested by CWG, which was to have a call between "IETF Trustees and Names reps" to go over a number of questions/points of information that the Names reps and counsel would like to clarify with representatives of the IETF Trustees. This should be the first item on the agenda. We've been working with counsel to prepare that list of questions, and it should be ready to share very shortly today. There should still be room for the rest of the items you mention, though I have a hard stop after an hour.
On agenda item 2 in your email, we have also prepared revised versions of the Community Agreement and License Agreement that are almost ready to be circulated. However, there are a few open items in our draft that relate to the questions/information mentioned above, and we wanted to have that discussion first, and then modify the drafts based on what we've learned from the call. I would expect us to be able to turn the draft back to the IETF Trust and the other communities within 24-48 hours after tomorrow's call. (Note that I am promising other people's work to some extent, but I still think my expectations are realistic.)
On agenda item 1 in your email, I think the issues are probably best identified in our drafts (rather than cobbling together an issues list), though I think several of them should come up in the discussion mentioned in my first paragraph (and some may well be resolved by that discussion).
Best regards,
Greg