Hell all,
I would like to follow up about a meeting in Helsinki.
- It will be useful if we can meet face to face in Helsinki subject to (a)
members of this group being in Helsinki and (b) a mutually convenient time slot. Who will schedule this? German?
I agree that a meeting would be useful.
German, Would you help in confirming everyone's availabilities, fix date and time and arrange a room?
Paul :Leaves on Wednesday and is available on Tue 1300-1500. Alan: Flexible Nurani: TBC Izumi: Flexible *except* 1) Tue 0930-1030 (IANA & CCWG WS1 session) 2) Tue lunch (1200-1315), and 3) Wed lunch (1215-1345), Wed evening (2000-)
We may want to consider early morning (breakfast) meeting or early evening meeting as an option, depending on everyone's availabilities.
I note Andrew cannot join us in person. I think we can accommodate some form of remote participation if he would be available (but also understand if cannot join ).
Izumi
On 2016/06/22 17:52, Alan Barrett wrote:
On 21 Jun 2016, at 21:09, Jonathan Robinson jrobinson@afilias.info wrote:
All,
Following the call today, I agree to share a set of actions arising from our discussion.
As I have noted them, they are as follows:
- The key questions and issues arising from the Sidley review of the
Principal Terms need to be organised, reviewed and dealt with. CWG Stewardship (Names) will tabulate these for ease of processing. Issues needing resolution by CWG only will be dealt with by CWG. Issues needing resolution by all three operations communities will be referred back to this (IANA IPR) group.
OK.
- We will utilise ICANN project management staff to track the key issues
and integrate this (IANA IPR) stream of work into the overall project tracking and reporting (Jonathan / Lise to arrange)
I think that those of us in the iana-ipr group can manage the project, but it would be nice if ICANN tracked the progress.
- It will be useful if we can meet face to face in Helsinki subject to (a)
members of this group being in Helsinki and (b) a mutually convenient time slot. Who will schedule this? German?
I agree that a meeting would be useful.
- Draft agreements for three licences of the IPR are being prepared by IETF
Trust legal counsel (Andrew). These will be sent this group for review once drafted
Please review and provide comment regarding any errors or omissions.
In addition, I understood that Sidley will be asked to provide a draft the Community Agreement and I am not clear who will lead on the IPR assignment from ICANN (ICANN Legal?)
I agree on the IETF Trust taking the lead on drafting the licenses for ICANN to use the IPR.
For the community agreeement, at least for the names community, it makes sense for Sidley to draft. However, I don’t think we have made a decision on how many community agreements there will be (see my other email message, subject “Decisions to be made soon”).
I expect that the agreement for assignment of IPR from ICANN to the IETF Trust will be quite straightforward, and I suggest that the IETF Trust could take the lead in drafting it.
Alan Barrett
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr