I encourage you all to review the document so that I can accept all non-controversial changes now in track changes. That doesn't mean the point is closed, but it will help us focus.
Thank you Andrew for taking the time with the document.
Greg
On Wednesday, February 3, 2016, Andrew Sullivan <
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
So this means that today's call is cancelled, right?
A
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 03:30:21PM +0400, Alan Barrett wrote:
>
> > On 2 Feb 2016, at 10:27, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Izumi & Colleagues,
> >
> > A couple of points:
> >
> > 1. On quorum, it seems that for now at least, we must have Greg and either
> > Lise or myself.
> > 2. Having spoken with Greg, he has a real challenge with the proposed time.
>
> Let us then extend the doodle poll, and choose a time when Greg is available.
>
> http://doodle.com/poll/ph2iakpvbkkrvfwr
>
> > 3. It will be most useful, and arguably a necessary precursor to a meeting,
> > if participants in this group can review and provide input to the current
> > document.
> > That way, we can use the meeting to discuss the document and any input on
> > it.
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oR3nmHl1fK7BEWOBK65KyvnmhTJZX70j9q4Ne9i4
> > ad4/edit?ts=56a78ed9
>
> I have read previous comments on the document, but I have not added any comments myself. I agree that we need to work further on the document prior to a call.
>
> Alan Barrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr@nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr