Hi
Based on previous agreement on representation:
* Greg Shatan * One or both of Lise Fuhr or Jonathan Robinson (CWG) * One or both of Alan Barrett or Paul Wilson (NRO) * One or both of Izumi Okutani or Nurani Nimpuno (CRISP) * One or both of Andrew Sullivan (IAB) or Jari Arkko (IETF)
So far we have Monday June 20th 8:00 AM UTC where all OC are represented, pending confirmation from Greg
As soon as we complete all parties i’ll send the webex details
German
On 14 Jun 2016, at 9:30 PM, German Valdez german@nro.net wrote:
Hi
Please complete the below poll at your earliest convenience
http://doodle.com/poll/g99cu7sxqn6mnf78
As per previous agreement the common time we need is with at least one representative from each OC plus Greg
regards
German
On 14 Jun 2016, at 1:27 PM, Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:57:06PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
It's my understanding that IETF's counsel has not yet completed its review of the Proposed Principal Terms document.
Nope, I sent something to the list some while ago saying the Trust said it was ok with it.
When does IETF expect to receive counsel's review and circulate it to this group?
We don't expect to circulate it to this group. That's a review delivered to the Trust so the Trust could decide what to do.
Also, has the IETF or IETF's counsel seen Sidley's mark-up yet (and if so, when can we expect to hear back about it)?
I have circulated it, yes. I'll poke again.
Without these steps, it doesn't seem that the IETF can be ready to negotiate the agreement(s)
Why? We're ready to instruct our counsel to go negotiate based on this set of principles.
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr