Alan,
To clarify
>> The Trust preference is one Community Agreement executed
>> by all the communities. And it would be best it seems to me if
>> all were commenting on these docs at the same time, rather
>> than in separately in parallel, or serially.
What I was suggesting was that we include on one list the
representatives from the RIR, IETF, and Names communities
to review the Community Agreement and License documents.
As for a timeline, based on an assumption that the documents
should be ready to execute on 30 September, the Trust was
working from this timeline:
7 July Negotiation commences with all parties
8 August Trust agreements reached with all parties
All Agreements published for community comments
for 30 days (At a minimum for IETF community)
12 September Community Comments Period Ends
IETF community recommends modifications/no changes
Other communities recommend modifications/no changes
Trust considers recommendations and makes changes/no changes
Trust publishes response to comments and republishes
Agreements
30 September Execution of all Trust Agreements
Trust with ICANN - IPR Transfer
Trust with PTI - License trademarks and domain use
Trust with Operating Communities (RIRs, Names, IETF)
Does that Timeline make sense?
As to making the documents “public” at this time. We had thought that
working through the details with the Community Reps and reaching
acceptability among us, then going “public” in our respective communities
for feedback, then getting the reps back together to discuss the docs would
work for a process.
Does that process make sense?
Ray
> On Jul 17, 2016, at 6:57 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett(a)afrinic.net> wrote:
>
>
>> On 17 Jul 2016, at 01:00, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier(a)isoc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> Did you get this email below from me?
>>
>> I’ve not heard back from anyone and I’m getting concerned
>> nothing is happening.
>
> Yes, thanks, Ray. I got the documents. I have just sent a reminder to the RIRs’ legal team to review them.
>
>> There is actually quite a tight timeline to make progress to
>> reach a point where the agreements can be executed on
>> 30 September. For the Trust that includes a lengthy
>> Community comment period, and I’m reasonably sure the
>> operational communities also have a community review
>> process.
>
> Yes, we will also want a community review period.
>
> May we make the current drafts public now?
>
>> The Trust is seeking feedback on these documents from the
>> RIRs, Names and IETF communities.
>>
>> The Trust preference is one Community Agreement executed
>> by all the communities. And it would be best it seems to me if
>> all were commenting on these docs at the same time, rather
>> than in separately in parallel, or serially.
>
> I think we settled on a single community agreement during a meeting in Helsinki in June.
>
> I agree that commenting in parallel makes sense.
>
> Alan Barrett
>
