Iana-ipr

Download

iana-ipr@nro.net

April 2016

5 participants
2 discussions

Any update on the Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements?
by Lise Fuhr 02 May '16

02 May '16

Dear All, Jonathan and I have talked about if you could give us an update regarding the comments you received from your legal advisors regarding the Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements. It would be very helpful and appreciated if we could have the comments to pass on to our legal advice. Best regards, Lise

2 2

Some suggestions from IANAPLAN today
by Andrew Sullivan 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

Hi, As you may know, the IETF is meeting this week, and we had an IANAPLAN meeting to make sure that we've not done anything inconsistent with the previously-established consensus. The support was in general positive. There are two items that I think we could consider putting in. First in the bit about the registration rules for iana.org and friends, the first introduction of "to prohibit updates" or whatever it is, we could add a footnote to make it clear that what we're talking about are status values in the shared registration system -- clientUpdateProhibited, clientDeleteProhibited, and clientTransferProhibited. I think this is just a clarification, and no big deal. A more substantive suggestion came from John Levine, who suggested that we specify that the CCG needs to publish at its first meeting, and then update from time to time, the quorum rules and other decision-making processes they use. A suggestion in the room was that the rules be open to the CCG, except that quorum requires not only a majority but some guarantee that at least one appointee from each of the communities must be present for quorum. I think this is a good principle, because it ensures openness and procedural consistency (no making up rules when a decision is needed). Does anyone object? Does it seem reasonable? Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs(a)anvilwalrusden.com

4 4