IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template
Dear all, Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link: https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMo... I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document. So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday). After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic. Kind regards Filiz
Filiz (et. al) - This looks fine to me with one suggestion. I think we need to state the specific review period, i.e. "This review report covers the periods 1 April 2017 through 31 December 2017". Perhaps this could be part of section 3. Methodology, sub-section 3.1 Overview? Otherwise, looks great. Nate From: <rc-bounces@nro.net<mailto:rc-bounces@nro.net>> on behalf of Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com<mailto:koalafil@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM To: "rc@nro.net<mailto:rc@nro.net>" <rc@nro.net<mailto:rc@nro.net>> Subject: [IANA-RC] IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template Dear all, Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link: https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMo... I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document. So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday). After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic. Kind regards Filiz
Hi Nate, Thanks for that. That is a very good comment. I will add it to the document. Nurani
On 29 Nov 2017, at 13:06, Nate Davis <ndavis@arin.net> wrote:
Filiz (et. al) -
This looks fine to me with one suggestion. I think we need to state the specific review period, i.e. “This review report covers the periods 1 April 2017 through 31 December 2017”. Perhaps this could be part of section 3. Methodology, sub-section 3.1 Overview?
Otherwise, looks great.
Nate
From: <rc-bounces@nro.net <mailto:rc-bounces@nro.net>> on behalf of Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com <mailto:koalafil@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM To: "rc@nro.net <mailto:rc@nro.net>" <rc@nro.net <mailto:rc@nro.net>> Subject: [IANA-RC] IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template
Dear all,
Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link:
https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMo... <https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMoawUiMKQ-K2__qbuztEDU/edit?usp=sharing>
I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document. So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday).
After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic.
Kind regards Filiz
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi Filiz, Thank you so much for drafting the draft template. Just one point, the acronym 'RC' appears fist in section 2.5 title, so it will be better to put the original meanings previously, may be in 1.1, such as 'Review Committee (RC)'. Yours Sincerely, --- Tomohiro Fujisaki 2017-11-29 0:23 GMT+09:00 Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com>:
Dear all,
Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link:
https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMo...
I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document. So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday).
After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic.
Kind regards Filiz
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Thank you Tomohiro. I have changed this now. I believe the document is public so that everyone can put their comments in the document directly. Kind regards, Nurani
On 30 Nov 2017, at 06:18, 藤崎智宏 <fujisaki@syce.net> wrote:
Hi Filiz,
Thank you so much for drafting the draft template.
Just one point, the acronym 'RC' appears fist in section 2.5 title, so it will be better to put the original meanings previously, may be in 1.1, such as 'Review Committee (RC)'.
Yours Sincerely, --- Tomohiro Fujisaki
2017-11-29 0:23 GMT+09:00 Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com>:
Dear all,
Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link:
https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMo...
I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document. So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday).
After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic.
Kind regards Filiz
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Dear colleagues, Report template Since the week has past and we haven’t had more comments on the draft template, I propose we use this general structure for our first report at the start of next year. There will be opportunity to fine tune it as we write our report of course. However, once we have published our first report, I believe we should aim for consistency and adopt the same general structure for any future reports. Thank you all for your contributions so far this year. Meeting schedule 2018 After having consulted Nate on the RIRs timeline, I am now working with my co-chair Jason to come up with the meeting timeline for next year. I will then ask the NRO secretariat to do a doodle poll for the first meeting around the time of the publication of the first RIR matrix. Kind regards, Nurani
On 30 Nov 2017, at 10:58, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thank you Tomohiro.
I have changed this now.
I believe the document is public so that everyone can put their comments in the document directly.
Kind regards,
Nurani
On 30 Nov 2017, at 06:18, 藤崎智宏 <fujisaki@syce.net> wrote:
Hi Filiz,
Thank you so much for drafting the draft template.
Just one point, the acronym 'RC' appears fist in section 2.5 title, so it will be better to put the original meanings previously, may be in 1.1, such as 'Review Committee (RC)'.
Yours Sincerely, --- Tomohiro Fujisaki
2017-11-29 0:23 GMT+09:00 Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com>:
Dear all,
Following up on my (voluntold :) action from the last meeting, pls find an IANA Numbering Services Review Committee Report - Draft template in the following link:
https://docs.google.com/a/nimblebits.net/document/d/1pLmyspy-Ph0jX50NlCg9ZMo...
I believe we agreed to have 1 week review period for this document. So pls review and note your suggestions if any on the document until 5 December (next Tuesday).
After that, we hopefully can conclude this topic.
Kind regards Filiz
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
participants (4)
-
Filiz Yilmaz -
Nate Davis -
Nurani Nimpuno -
藤崎智宏