Meetings 2018 + Minimum meeting notice
Dear colleagues, At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up. This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report. I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable. Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice. As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines. I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach. Kind regards, Nurani
Great approach - I fully agree. Nate On 11/28/17, 3:48 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
2017-11-28 22:36 GMT+09:00 Nate Davis <ndavis@arin.net>:
Great approach - I fully agree.
+1 Yours Sincerely, --- Tomohiro Fujisaki 2017-11-28 22:36 GMT+09:00 Nate Davis <ndavis@arin.net>:
Great approach - I fully agree.
Nate
On 11/28/17, 3:48 AM, "rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno" <rc-bounces@nro.net on behalf of nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi Nurani, I support your proposal. regards, George On 28/11/17 6:48 pm, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hello Nurani I agree with your proposal. Regards Madhvi On 28/11/2017 12:48 PM, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Madhvi Gokool Registration Services Manager, AFRINIC Ltd. t: +230 403 5100 | f: +230 466 6758 | w: www.afrinic.net
I am happy with it too Omo
On 29 Nov 2017, at 06:30, Madhvi Gokool <madhvi@afrinic.net> wrote:
Hello Nurani
I agree with your proposal.
Regards Madhvi
On 28/11/2017 12:48 PM, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Madhvi Gokool Registration Services Manager, AFRINIC Ltd. t: +230 403 5100 | f: +230 466 6758 | w: www.afrinic.net
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Agreed On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Thanks all. Unless I hear any objections in the coming day, we will proceed with this. I will coordinate with Jason and the secretariat to propose four set meeting dates for 2018. Kind regards, Nurani
On 7 Dec 2017, at 13:43, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote: Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc>
I support this proposal. __Jason On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thanks all.
Unless I hear any objections in the coming day, we will proceed with this.
I will coordinate with Jason and the secretariat to propose four set meeting dates for 2018.
Kind regards,
Nurani
On 7 Dec 2017, at 13:43, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.com|571-266-0006
+1 On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Jason Schiller <jschiller@google.com> wrote:
I support this proposal.
__Jason
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thanks all.
Unless I hear any objections in the coming day, we will proceed with this.
I will coordinate with Jason and the secretariat to propose four set meeting dates for 2018.
Kind regards,
Nurani
On 7 Dec 2017, at 13:43, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At our last call, the question of a minimum notice before meetings are called came up.
This first year has of course been a little different as we have used the year to organise ourselves, write our operating procedures and set our time schedule for our report.
I anticipate that we will need very little of this type of work in the coming years, as the main task of the Review Committee is to simply review the performance of the IANA Numbering Services as outlined in the SLA. The timeline for our work will most likely be very predictable.
Therefore, I propose that we set four fixed dates for the RC to meet throughout the year, which can be published and announced at the start of the year. If we need schedule any additional meetings, we can of course do so, and I propose we do so with at least two weeks' notice.
As we have agreement on our operating procedures, I suggest that we leave that document as it is, but work according to these guidelines.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Kind regards,
Nurani _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.com|571-266-0006 <(571)%20266-0006>
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
participants (9)
-
Filiz Yilmaz -
George Kuo -
Jason Schiller -
Louie Lee -
Madhvi Gokool -
Nate Davis -
Nurani Nimpuno -
Omo Oaiya -
藤崎智宏