Updates to our current Operating procedures
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC- gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit# The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided. In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2. The new text is also included below for reference. NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes. Thanks, __Jason "5.1 Expedited Performance Report In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement. 5.2 Community Feedback The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report." The removed section 5 text is as follows: "The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
Thanks Jason. This looks good. As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures. Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC. Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments. I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures. German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website? Thanks and kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi Nurani Sorry for my late response. I have no objection to the edits. thanks, George On 9/5/18 7:26 pm, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi Nurani Noted. Cheers German From: <rc-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> Date: Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 7:26 pm To: "rc@nro.net" <rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Updates to our current Operating procedures Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments. I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures. German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website? Thanks and kind regards, Nurani On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net<mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote: Thanks Jason. This looks good. As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures. Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC. Kind regards, Nurani On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net<mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote: As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit> The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided. In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2. The new text is also included below for reference. NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes. Thanks, __Jason "5.1 Expedited Performance Report In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement. 5.2 Community Feedback The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report." The removed section 5 text is as follows: "The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice." _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net<mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi RC, The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce... (linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/) Thanks, Susannah On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net
Thank you Susannah ! Enjoy thy week-end Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net> a écrit :
Hi RC,
The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce... <https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Procedures_30-April-2018.pdf> (linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/ <https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/>) Thanks, Susannah
On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc>
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc>
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net <http://www.nro.net/> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
All, As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating procedures. To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make suggestions) see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not see unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to comment. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515 The document without the comments is the current procedures. To see a pdf of the red-line changes see: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=s... To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgN... To see this summary see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13... There are two changes: 1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized. 2. Preamble (section 0) text As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018. So if you reviewed the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have comment rights on the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body of the email, then you may not have seen these changes before. Again my apologies for that.) New section 5 ------------------- "5. Review Process At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR communities for a comment period of 30 days. 5.1 Expedited Performance Report In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement. 5.2 Community Feedback The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report." Old section 5 ------------------ "5. Review Process At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice. “ Changes to section 5 ---------------------------- First two sentences were kept as is. The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into section 5.2 and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the matrix, and that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely lost. We did keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and included in the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a formal report) to the RIRs as appropriate. The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the comments are collected and considered. The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are expected to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the community and collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only during the 30 day comment period). It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA Numbering Services Operations. Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report was added. 2. The following preamble text was added: “The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services provided to the Internet Number Community. The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided. Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the Internet numbers community.” This was previously “section 0” text. We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it was important and placed the text on our web site. The text was recently dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline the web site. I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures, and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website. Thanks, ___Jason On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> wrote:
Thank you Susannah !
Enjoy thy week-end
Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net> a écrit :
Hi RC,
The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
(linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/)
Thanks,
Susannah
On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing listRc@nro.nethttps://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Supportwww.nro.net
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Replying to bump this to the top of the mail box, and refresh everyone on the discussion. ___Jason On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:45 PM Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
All,
As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating procedures.
To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make suggestions) see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not see unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to comment. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515 The document without the comments is the current procedures.
To see a pdf of the red-line changes see: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=s...
To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgN...
To see this summary see:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13...
There are two changes:
1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized.
2. Preamble (section 0) text
As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018. So if you reviewed
the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have comment rights on
the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body of the email,
then you may not have seen these changes before. Again my apologies for that.)
New section 5
-------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days.
5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC
chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective
RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant
developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect
feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective
community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate.
These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and
included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
Old section 5
------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members
are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the
comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement
channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee
gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and
summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix,
with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO
EC as advice. “
Changes to section 5
----------------------------
First two sentences were kept as is.
The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into section 5.2
and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the matrix, and
that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely lost. We did
keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and included in
the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a formal report)
to the RIRs as appropriate.
The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR
communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the comments
are collected and considered.
The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are expected
to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the community and
collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only during the 30
day comment period). It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA Numbering
Services Operations.
Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report was added.
2. The following preamble text was added:
“The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services provided to the Internet Number Community.
The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided. Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the Internet numbers community.”
This was previously “section 0” text.
We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it was important and placed the text on our web site. The text was recently dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline the web site.
I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures, and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website.
Thanks,
___Jason
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier < b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> wrote:
Thank you Susannah !
Enjoy thy week-end
Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net> a écrit :
Hi RC,
The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
(linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/)
Thanks,
Susannah
On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing listRc@nro.nethttps://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Supportwww.nro.net
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
German, Just thought I would ping this thread to bring it back up to the top of the in box in support of ACTION ITEM 190320-1, and add the action item number to make the thread easy to find. ___Jason On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:45 PM Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
All,
As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating procedures.
To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make suggestions) see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not see unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to comment. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515 The document without the comments is the current procedures.
To see a pdf of the red-line changes see: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=s...
To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgN...
To see this summary see:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13...
There are two changes:
1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized.
2. Preamble (section 0) text
As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018. So if you reviewed
the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have comment rights on
the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body of the email,
then you may not have seen these changes before. Again my apologies for that.)
New section 5
-------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days.
5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC
chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective
RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant
developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect
feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective
community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate.
These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and
included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
Old section 5
------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members
are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the
comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement
channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee
gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and
summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix,
with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO
EC as advice. “
Changes to section 5
----------------------------
First two sentences were kept as is.
The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into section 5.2
and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the matrix, and
that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely lost. We did
keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and included in
the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a formal report)
to the RIRs as appropriate.
The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR
communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the comments
are collected and considered.
The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are expected
to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the community and
collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only during the 30
day comment period). It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA Numbering
Services Operations.
Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report was added.
2. The following preamble text was added:
“The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services provided to the Internet Number Community.
The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided. Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the Internet numbers community.”
This was previously “section 0” text.
We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it was important and placed the text on our web site. The text was recently dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline the web site.
I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures, and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website.
Thanks,
___Jason
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier < b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> wrote:
Thank you Susannah !
Enjoy thy week-end
Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net> a écrit :
Hi RC,
The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
(linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/)
Thanks,
Susannah
On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing listRc@nro.nethttps://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Supportwww.nro.net
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hi all, Please find the updated procedures online at: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce... They can be accessed from this page: https://www.nro.net/accountability/operational/iana-numbering-services-revie... Thanks, Susannah On 24/08/2019 16:22, Jason Schiller wrote: German, Just thought I would ping this thread to bring it back up to the top of the in box in support of ACTION ITEM 190320-1, and add the action item number to make the thread easy to find. ___Jason On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:45 PM Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net<mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote: All, As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating procedures. To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make suggestions) see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not see unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to comment. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515 The document without the comments is the current procedures. To see a pdf of the red-line changes see: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=s... To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgN... To see this summary see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13... There are two changes: 1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized. 2. Preamble (section 0) text As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018. So if you reviewed the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have comment rights on the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body of the email, then you may not have seen these changes before. Again my apologies for that.) New section 5 ------------------- "5. Review Process At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR communities for a comment period of 30 days. 5.1 Expedited Performance Report In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement. 5.2 Community Feedback The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report." Old section 5 ------------------ "5. Review Process At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice. “ Changes to section 5 ---------------------------- First two sentences were kept as is. The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into section 5.2 and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the matrix, and that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely lost. We did keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and included in the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a formal report) to the RIRs as appropriate. The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the comments are collected and considered. The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are expected to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the community and collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only during the 30 day comment period). It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA Numbering Services Operations. Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report was added. 2. The following preamble text was added: “The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services provided to the Internet Number Community. The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided. Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the Internet numbers community.” This was previously “section 0” text. We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it was important and placed the text on our web site. The text was recently dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline the web site. I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures, and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website. Thanks, ___Jason On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherrier@micrologic.nc<mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc>> wrote: Thank you Susannah ! Enjoy thy week-end Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc<mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min) Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net<mailto:susannah@apnic.net>> a écrit : Hi RC, The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce... (linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/) Thanks, Susannah On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote: Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments. I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures. German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website? Thanks and kind regards, Nurani On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net<mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote: Thanks Jason. This looks good. As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures. Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC. Kind regards, Nurani On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net<mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote: As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided. In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2. The new text is also included below for reference. NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes. Thanks, __Jason "5.1 Expedited Performance Report In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement. 5.2 Community Feedback The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report." The removed section 5 text is as follows: "The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice." _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net<mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net<mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc -- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net<http://www.nro.net/> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net<mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net<mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc -- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net<http://www.nro.net>
Thanks Susannah! El 10/10/19 a las 17:08, Susannah Gray escribió:
Hi all,
Please find the updated procedures online at: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
They can be accessed from this page: https://www.nro.net/accountability/operational/iana-numbering-services-revie...
Thanks,
Susannah
On 24/08/2019 16:22, Jason Schiller wrote:
German,
Just thought I would ping this thread to bring it back up to the top of the in box in support of ACTION ITEM 190320-1, and add the action item number to make the thread easy to find.
___Jason
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:45 PM Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote:
All,
As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating procedures.
To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make suggestions) see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not see unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to comment. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515 <https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515> The document without the comments is the current procedures.
To see a pdf of the red-line changes see: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=s...
To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgN...
To see this summary see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13...
There are two changes:
1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized.
2. Preamble (section 0) text
As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018. So if you reviewed
the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have comment rights on
the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body of the email,
then you may not have seen these changes before. Again my apologies for that.)
New section 5
-------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days.
5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC
chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective
RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant
developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect
feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective
community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate.
These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and
included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
Old section 5
------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members
are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the
comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement
channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee
gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and
summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix,
with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO
EC as advice. “
Changes to section 5
----------------------------
First two sentences were kept as is.
The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into section 5.2
and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the matrix, and
that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely lost. We did
keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and included in
the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a formal report)
to the RIRs as appropriate.
The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR
communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the comments
are collected and considered.
The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are expected
to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the community and
collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only during the 30
day comment period). It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA Numbering
Services Operations.
Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report was added.
2. The following preamble text was added:
“The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services provided to the Internet Number Community.
The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided. Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the Internet numbers community.”
This was previously “section 0” text.
We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it was important and placed the text on our web site. The text was recently dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline the web site.
I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures, and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website.
Thanks,
___Jason
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherrier@micrologic.nc <mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc>> wrote:
Thank you Susannah !
Enjoy thy week-end
Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc <mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net <mailto:susannah@apnic.net>> a écrit :
Hi RC,
The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
(linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/)
Thanks,
Susannah
On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net <http://www.nro.net/> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Susannah (And the secretariat and staff), As always, Thank you! ___Jason On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:08 PM Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Please find the updated procedures online at:
https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
They can be accessed from this page:
https://www.nro.net/accountability/operational/iana-numbering-services-revie...
Thanks,
Susannah On 24/08/2019 16:22, Jason Schiller wrote:
German,
Just thought I would ping this thread to bring it back up to the top of the in box in support of ACTION ITEM 190320-1, and add the action item number to make the thread easy to find.
___Jason
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:45 PM Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
All,
As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating procedures.
To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make suggestions) see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not see unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to comment. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515 The document without the comments is the current procedures.
To see a pdf of the red-line changes see: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=s...
To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgN...
To see this summary see:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13...
There are two changes:
1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized.
2. Preamble (section 0) text
As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018. So if you reviewed
the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have comment rights on
the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body of the email,
then you may not have seen these changes before. Again my apologies for that.)
New section 5
-------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days.
5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC
chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective
RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant
developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect
feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective
community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate.
These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and
included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
Old section 5
------------------
"5. Review Process
At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering
Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of
the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review
matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR
communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members
are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the
comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement
channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee
gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and
summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix,
with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO
EC as advice. “
Changes to section 5
----------------------------
First two sentences were kept as is.
The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into section 5.2
and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the matrix, and
that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely lost. We did
keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and included in
the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a formal report)
to the RIRs as appropriate.
The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR
communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the comments
are collected and considered.
The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are expected
to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the community and
collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only during the 30
day comment period). It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA Numbering
Services Operations.
Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report was added.
2. The following preamble text was added:
“The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services provided to the Internet Number Community.
The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided. Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the Internet numbers community.”
This was previously “section 0” text.
We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it was important and placed the text on our web site. The text was recently dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline the web site.
I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures, and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website.
Thanks,
___Jason
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier < b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> wrote:
Thank you Susannah !
Enjoy thy week-end
Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net> a écrit :
Hi RC,
The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
(linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/)
Thanks,
Susannah
On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing listRc@nro.nethttps://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Supportwww.nro.net
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Supportwww.nro.net
Thanks for that Susannah! Nurani
On 11 Oct 2019, at 00:08, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net> wrote:
Hi all, Please find the updated procedures online at: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce...
<https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Procedures_v2.0_10-October-2019.pdf>They can be accessed from this page: https://www.nro.net/accountability/operational/iana-numbering-services-revie... <https://www.nro.net/accountability/operational/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/> Thanks, Susannah On 24/08/2019 16:22, Jason Schiller wrote:
German,
Just thought I would ping this thread to bring it back up to the top of the in box in support of ACTION ITEM 190320-1, and add the action item number to make the thread easy to find.
___Jason
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:45 PM Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote: All,
As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating procedures.
To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make suggestions) see: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not see unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to comment. https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515 <https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515> The document without the comments is the current procedures.
To see a pdf of the red-line changes see: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=s... <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=sharing>
To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see: -https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgN... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgNTn0/edit?usp=sharing>
To see this summary see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13wbg/edit?usp=sharing>
There are two changes:
1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized. 2. Preamble (section 0) text
As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018. So if you reviewed the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have comment rights on the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body of the email, then you may not have seen these changes before. Again my apologies for that.)
New section 5 ------------------- "5. Review Process At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR communities for a comment period of 30 days.
5.1 Expedited Performance Report In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
Old section 5 ------------------ "5. Review Process At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA Numbering Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review of the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five RIR communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice. “
Changes to section 5 ---------------------------- First two sentences were kept as is.
The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into section 5.2 and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the matrix, and that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely lost. We did keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and included in the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a formal report) to the RIRs as appropriate.
The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the comments are collected and considered.
The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are expected to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the community and collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only during the 30 day comment period). It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA Numbering Services Operations.
Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report was added.
2. The following preamble text was added: “The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services provided to the Internet Number Community.
The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided. Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the Internet numbers community.”
This was previously “section 0” text. We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it was important and placed the text on our web site. The text was recently dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline the web site.
I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures, and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website.
Thanks,
___Jason
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherrier@micrologic.nc <mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc>> wrote: Thank you Susannah !
Enjoy thy week-end
Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems b.cherrier@micrologic.nc <mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> https://www.mls.nc <https://www.mls.nc/> Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah@apnic.net <mailto:susannah@apnic.net>> a écrit :
Hi RC,
The new procedures have been uploaded: https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Proce... <https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Procedures_30-April-2018.pdf> (linked from here: https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/ <https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/>) Thanks, Susannah
On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting comments.
I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
German and the NRO secretariat, could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF on the RC website?
Thanks and kind regards,
Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani@nimblebits.net>> wrote:
Thanks Jason. This looks good.
As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these changes as part of our operational procedures.
Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
Kind regards, Nurani
On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net <mailto:jason-phone@schiller.net>> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc>
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc>
-- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net <http://www.nro.net/> _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc>
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net <mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc <https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc> -- Susannah Gray NRO Secretariat Support www.nro.net <http://www.nro.net/>
Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Thanks Jason. I am ok with these edits. Regards Ernesto El 1/5/18 a las 21:49, Jason Schiller escribió:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#>
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
I fine with these edits as well. Thanks Jason. Nate From: <rc-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Ernesto Majó <ernesto@lacnic.net> Date: Monday, May 7, 2018 at 2:54 PM To: "rc@nro.net" <rc@nro.net> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Updates to our current Operating procedures Thanks Jason. I am ok with these edits. Regards Ernesto El 1/5/18 a las 21:49, Jason Schiller escribió: As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit> The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided. In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2. The new text is also included below for reference. NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes. Thanks, __Jason "5.1 Expedited Performance Report In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement. 5.2 Community Feedback The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report." The removed section 5 text is as follows: "The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice." _______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net<mailto:Rc@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
Hello I am ok with these edits. Regards Madhvi On 07/05/2018 7:18 PM, Nate Davis wrote:
I fine with these edits as well.
Thanks Jason.
Nate
*From: *<rc-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Ernesto Majó <ernesto@lacnic.net> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 2:54 PM *To: *"rc@nro.net" <rc@nro.net> *Subject: *Re: [IANA-RC] Updates to our current Operating procedures
Thanks Jason.
I am ok with these edits.
Regards
Ernesto
El 1/5/18 a las 21:49, Jason Schiller escribió:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures
(version 1) with edits.
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz
provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been
superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this
update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after
this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change
is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________
Rc mailing list
Rc@nro.net<mailto:Rc@nro.net>
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- Madhvi Gokool Registration Services Manager, AFRINIC Ltd. t: +230 403 5100 | f: +230 466 6758 | w: www.afrinic.net
Hi Jason Thanks so much for taking time to sort this out and the edits look fine with me too... Noah On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Jason Schiller <jason-phone@schiller.net> wrote:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-g IQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
-- *./noah*
Ok with the edits. Thanks Jason. Nicolas El El mar, 1 de may. de 2018 a las 21:49, Jason Schiller < jason-phone@schiller.net> escribió:
As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures (version 1) with edits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRf...
The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2. This is the text Filiz provided.
In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
The new text is also included below for reference.
NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this update. I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
Thanks,
__Jason
"5.1 Expedited Performance Report
In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
5.2 Community Feedback
The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their respective community. This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
The removed section 5 text is as follows:
"The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice."
_______________________________________________ Rc mailing list Rc@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
participants (11)
-
Bertrand Cherrier -
Ernesto Majó -
George Kuo -
German Valdez -
Jason Schiller -
Madhvi Gokool -
Nate Davis -
Nicolas Antoniello -
Noah -
Nurani Nimpuno -
Susannah Gray