Jason, I agree with your assessment. Thanks and regards Brajesh From: Jason Schiller [mailto:jschiller@google.com] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 8:07 PM To: Brajesh Jain <brajesh.jain@spectranet.in> Cc: German Valdez <german@nro.net>; AC COORD <ac-coord@aso.icann.org>; rc@nro.net Subject: Re: [AC-COORD] A Note for need of Second f2f meeting of ASOAC/RC (apologies for cross posting AC-Coord and RC) Brajesh, I believe the attached document is in response to action item 20170111-06: "BJ to send the suggestion about a second F2F meeting to the list." After review of the document it seems this is justification is based on the need to complete Review Committee work. Reading between the line I think you are suggesting that the the Review Committee members should also meet during the ASO AC face to face at the ICANN meeting. In addition, the Review Committee needs a second face to face meeting for a few years while the RC is boot strapping, and settling in. If my assessment is correct, I would suggest that this discussion moved to the RC list. If you agree, please respond as such and move ac-coord@aso.icaan.org<mailto:ac-coord@aso.icaan.org> to bcc Thanks, __Jason On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Brajesh Jain <brajesh.jain@spectranet.in<mailto:brajesh.jain@spectranet.in>> wrote: Dear all, I have attempted a brief note as attached for further deliberations. Basically for Review Committee to function effectively, there is need for in depth multiple deliberations with constant feedback/inputs from Community. Such inputs are best sought through interaction being present at ICANN. Thanks and regards Brajesh _______________________________________________ AC-coord mailing list AC-coord@aso.icann.org<mailto:AC-coord@aso.icann.org> https://aso.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ac-coord -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller@google.com<mailto:jschiller@google.com>|571-266-0006