Since public comments have closed, I think we have the following tasks outstanding to finalize the IPR agreements. In the license agreement we are still awaiting a definition of “Names Community” (1.24). Can one of the names folks indicate when that is forthcoming? All of the agreements need final editorial clean-up: addresses and names of signatories need to be filled in, the headers indicating “Draft XX August” need to be removed, all other bracketed text needs to have brackets removed, the license agreement needs to be split into three agreements, the community agreement needs to have the final license agreements included as appendices, etc. Jorge, could I ask you to take up the task of producing final versions of all of the documents with these issues cleared up and filled in? You’ll need to ask signatories to provide names/addresses to you for inclusion. If it would be possible to have this done in advance of our call on Monday, that would be ideal. Once the documents are finalized, I can put together a posting for the ICG site that summarizes the outcome of the public comment process and the changes that were made by us. For Monday’s call, we can plan to: - Agree that we are done with the documents - Agree on text for a posting to the ICG site - Review schedule and mechanics for getting the agreements signed - Confirm each community’s plans to have initial CCG members appointed by Sept 30 (if folks have updates on that to share via email ahead of time, that would be good) Given the above, I think we can reduce from two hours to one for our Monday call. Does anyone object if we have our call be 20:00-21:00 UTC instead of 19:00-21:00 UTC on Monday? Thanks, Alissa
Alissa - I am happy to finalize and clean up the documents once others provide the missing information that you mention below. Best regards, Jorge Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately. On 9/15/16, 9:49 AM, "Alissa Cooper" <iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Since public comments have closed, I think we have the following tasks outstanding to finalize the IPR agreements.
In the license agreement we are still awaiting a definition of ³Names Community² (1.24). Can one of the names folks indicate when that is forthcoming?
All of the agreements need final editorial clean-up: addresses and names of signatories need to be filled in, the headers indicating ³Draft XX August² need to be removed, all other bracketed text needs to have brackets removed, the license agreement needs to be split into three agreements, the community agreement needs to have the final license agreements included as appendices, etc. Jorge, could I ask you to take up the task of producing final versions of all of the documents with these issues cleared up and filled in? You¹ll need to ask signatories to provide names/addresses to you for inclusion. If it would be possible to have this done in advance of our call on Monday, that would be ideal.
Once the documents are finalized, I can put together a posting for the ICG site that summarizes the outcome of the public comment process and the changes that were made by us.
For Monday¹s call, we can plan to: - Agree that we are done with the documents - Agree on text for a posting to the ICG site - Review schedule and mechanics for getting the agreements signed - Confirm each community¹s plans to have initial CCG members appointed by Sept 30 (if folks have updates on that to share via email ahead of time, that would be good)
Given the above, I think we can reduce from two hours to one for our Monday call. Does anyone object if we have our call be 20:00-21:00 UTC instead of 19:00-21:00 UTC on Monday?
Thanks, Alissa
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
On 15 Sep 2016, at 19:49, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote: All of the agreements need final editorial clean-up: addresses and names of signatories need to be filled in, the headers indicating “Draft XX August” need to be removed, all other bracketed text needs to have brackets removed, the license agreement needs to be split into three agreements, the community agreement needs to have the final license agreements included as appendices, etc.
For the five RIRs, I believe that the names and addresses of signatories can be copied from page 1 and page 24 of the “SLA” between the RIRs and ICANN <https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/ICANN-RIR-SLA-signature25May16.pdf>.
For Monday’s call, we can plan to: - Agree that we are done with the documents - Agree on text for a posting to the ICG site - Review schedule and mechanics for getting the agreements signed - Confirm each community’s plans to have initial CCG members appointed by Sept 30 (if folks have updates on that to share via email ahead of time, that would be good)
Given the above, I think we can reduce from two hours to one for our Monday call. Does anyone object if we have our call be 20:00-21:00 UTC instead of 19:00-21:00 UTC on Monday?
That all seems fine to me. Alan Barrett
On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Given the above, I think we can reduce from two hours to one for our Monday call. Does anyone object if we have our call be 20:00-21:00 UTC instead of 19:00-21:00 UTC on Monday?
I haven’t seen any objections. Staff, could you send updated invites to folks, reducing our Monday call to 20:00-21:00 UTC? Thanks. Alissa
Thanks, Alissa
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
I want more meetings and longer meetings, said no one, ever. Thank you for keeping us moving forward organizationally. Greg On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Given the above, I think we can reduce from two hours to one for our Monday call. Does anyone object if we have our call be 20:00-21:00 UTC instead of 19:00-21:00 UTC on Monday?
I haven’t seen any objections. Staff, could you send updated invites to folks, reducing our Monday call to 20:00-21:00 UTC? Thanks.
Alissa
Thanks, Alissa
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Hi Alissa, We will modify the meeting invite to start at 20:00 UTC for one hour duration. Regards, Yuko -----Original Message----- From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 1:21 PM To: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Next steps
On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Given the above, I think we can reduce from two hours to one for our Monday call. Does anyone object if we have our call be 20:00-21:00 UTC instead of 19:00-21:00 UTC on Monday?
I haven’t seen any objections. Staff, could you send updated invites to folks, reducing our Monday call to 20:00-21:00 UTC? Thanks. Alissa
Thanks, Alissa
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
On 17 Sep 2016, at 01:13, Yuko Green <yuko.green@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Alissa,
We will modify the meeting invite to start at 20:00 UTC for one hour duration.
I didn’t receive an invitation. I tried several times to join the meeting using the URL that worked for several previous meetings, but it connected me to something unrelated. Alan Barrett
Dear Alan, I'm sorry that there seemed to have been some sort of a mix up. I checked the meeting invite for Monday's IPR call (19 September) and your e-mail address was correctly reflected on the invitation. I am not certain what had happened. Just to be sure, will you please check your calendar to ensure you have the next IPR call on your calendar? It is for 21 September at 16:00 UTC for 1 hour at https://icann.adobeconnect.com/cwg-dt-stewardship/. Regards, Yuko -----Original Message----- From: Alan Barrett [mailto:alan.barrett@afrinic.net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:24 PM To: Yuko Green <yuko.green@icann.org> Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Next steps
On 17 Sep 2016, at 01:13, Yuko Green <yuko.green@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Alissa,
We will modify the meeting invite to start at 20:00 UTC for one hour duration.
I didn’t receive an invitation. I tried several times to join the meeting using the URL that worked for several previous meetings, but it connected me to something unrelated. Alan Barrett
participants (5)
-
Alan Barrett -
Alissa Cooper -
Greg Shatan -
Jorge Contreras -
Yuko Green