Summary note for ICG site
Here is a draft note for posting to the ICG site. — Summary of Changes to IANA IPR Agreements There were seven public comments <link> submitted regarding the IANA IPR agreements, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment. One comment <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/000002.html>was about the transition in general. There was nothing actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment. All of the other comments were supportive of the IANA IPR agreements as written. As a result, no edits to the agreements were made on the basis of the public comments received. However, at the time the agreements were put out for public comment, there were a number of placeholders in the text that required further discussion amongst the parties to the agreements and the operational communities in order to be finalized. These items have been addressed as follows: ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Section 6.1: The term of indemnification has been set at 3 years. LICENSE AGREEMENT Section 4.3.c: ICANN agrees to cover cost of ongoing enforcement actions existing as of the Effective Date. Section 7.4: The venue of arbitration will be New York and three arbitrators will be appointed if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator. Exhibit D, Item 5: Clarification provided that the use of ‘IANA’ as an entity name is permitted in archived RFCs and other documents. COMMUNITY AGREEMENT Preamble: ICANN has been identified as the Names Community signatory. Section 1.24: The following definition of "Names Community" has been provided, as agreed by the CWG: [TBD].
Looks good to me. -- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
On Sep 16, 2016, at 17:10, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Here is a draft note for posting to the ICG site.
—
Summary of Changes to IANA IPR Agreements
There were seven public comments <link> submitted regarding the IANA IPR agreements, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment.
One comment <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/000002.html>was about the transition in general. There was nothing actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment.
All of the other comments were supportive of the IANA IPR agreements as written.
As a result, no edits to the agreements were made on the basis of the public comments received.
However, at the time the agreements were put out for public comment, there were a number of placeholders in the text that required further discussion amongst the parties to the agreements and the operational communities in order to be finalized. These items have been addressed as follows:
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
Section 6.1: The term of indemnification has been set at 3 years.
LICENSE AGREEMENT
Section 4.3.c: ICANN agrees to cover cost of ongoing enforcement actions existing as of the Effective Date.
Section 7.4: The venue of arbitration will be New York and three arbitrators will be appointed if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator.
Exhibit D, Item 5: Clarification provided that the use of ‘IANA’ as an entity name is permitted in archived RFCs and other documents.
COMMUNITY AGREEMENT
Preamble: ICANN has been identified as the Names Community signatory.
Section 1.24: The following definition of "Names Community" has been provided, as agreed by the CWG: [TBD].
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
I am fine with it Lise -----Original Message----- From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: 17 September 2016 02:34 To: Alissa Cooper Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Summary note for ICG site Looks good to me. -- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
On Sep 16, 2016, at 17:10, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Here is a draft note for posting to the ICG site.
—
Summary of Changes to IANA IPR Agreements
There were seven public comments <link> submitted regarding the IANA IPR agreements, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment.
One comment <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/000002.html>was about the transition in general. There was nothing actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment.
All of the other comments were supportive of the IANA IPR agreements as written.
As a result, no edits to the agreements were made on the basis of the public comments received.
However, at the time the agreements were put out for public comment, there were a number of placeholders in the text that required further discussion amongst the parties to the agreements and the operational communities in order to be finalized. These items have been addressed as follows:
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
Section 6.1: The term of indemnification has been set at 3 years.
LICENSE AGREEMENT
Section 4.3.c: ICANN agrees to cover cost of ongoing enforcement actions existing as of the Effective Date.
Section 7.4: The venue of arbitration will be New York and three arbitrators will be appointed if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator.
Exhibit D, Item 5: Clarification provided that the use of ‘IANA’ as an entity name is permitted in archived RFCs and other documents.
COMMUNITY AGREEMENT
Preamble: ICANN has been identified as the Names Community signatory.
Section 1.24: The following definition of "Names Community" has been provided, as agreed by the CWG: [TBD].
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Ditto. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: Lise Fuhr [mailto:Fuhr@etno.eu] Sent: 19 September 2016 11:32 To: 'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>; Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Summary note for ICG site I am fine with it Lise -----Original Message----- From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: 17 September 2016 02:34 To: Alissa Cooper Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Summary note for ICG site Looks good to me. -- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
On Sep 16, 2016, at 17:10, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Here is a draft note for posting to the ICG site.
—
Summary of Changes to IANA IPR Agreements
There were seven public comments <link> submitted regarding the IANA IPR agreements, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment.
One comment <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/000002.html>was about the transition in general. There was nothing actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment.
All of the other comments were supportive of the IANA IPR agreements as written.
As a result, no edits to the agreements were made on the basis of the public comments received.
However, at the time the agreements were put out for public comment, there were a number of placeholders in the text that required further discussion amongst the parties to the agreements and the operational communities in order to be finalized. These items have been addressed as follows:
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
Section 6.1: The term of indemnification has been set at 3 years.
LICENSE AGREEMENT
Section 4.3.c: ICANN agrees to cover cost of ongoing enforcement actions existing as of the Effective Date.
Section 7.4: The venue of arbitration will be New York and three arbitrators will be appointed if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator.
Exhibit D, Item 5: Clarification provided that the use of ‘IANA’ as an entity name is permitted in archived RFCs and other documents.
COMMUNITY AGREEMENT
Preamble: ICANN has been identified as the Names Community signatory.
Section 1.24: The following definition of "Names Community" has been provided, as agreed by the CWG: [TBD].
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
Same here. Greg On Monday, September 19, 2016, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
Ditto. Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Lise Fuhr [mailto:Fuhr@etno.eu <javascript:;>] Sent: 19 September 2016 11:32 To: 'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com <javascript:;>>; Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in <javascript:;>> Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net <javascript:;> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Summary note for ICG site
I am fine with it Lise
-----Original Message----- From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net <javascript:;> [mailto: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: 17 September 2016 02:34 To: Alissa Cooper Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net <javascript:;> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Summary note for ICG site
Looks good to me.
-- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
On Sep 16, 2016, at 17:10, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in <javascript:;>> wrote:
Here is a draft note for posting to the ICG site.
—
Summary of Changes to IANA IPR Agreements
There were seven public comments <link> submitted regarding the IANA IPR agreements, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment.
One comment <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg. org/2016-September/000002.html>was about the transition in general. There was nothing actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment.
All of the other comments were supportive of the IANA IPR agreements as written.
As a result, no edits to the agreements were made on the basis of the public comments received.
However, at the time the agreements were put out for public comment, there were a number of placeholders in the text that required further discussion amongst the parties to the agreements and the operational communities in order to be finalized. These items have been addressed as follows:
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
Section 6.1: The term of indemnification has been set at 3 years.
LICENSE AGREEMENT
Section 4.3.c: ICANN agrees to cover cost of ongoing enforcement actions existing as of the Effective Date.
Section 7.4: The venue of arbitration will be New York and three arbitrators will be appointed if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator.
Exhibit D, Item 5: Clarification provided that the use of ‘IANA’ as an entity name is permitted in archived RFCs and other documents.
COMMUNITY AGREEMENT
Preamble: ICANN has been identified as the Names Community signatory.
Section 1.24: The following definition of "Names Community" has been provided, as agreed by the CWG: [TBD].
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net <javascript:;> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net <javascript:;> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net <javascript:;> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net <javascript:;> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
And here as well. Thanks guys. Jari On 19 Sep 2016, at 14:21, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Same here.
Greg
On Monday, September 19, 2016, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: Ditto. Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Lise Fuhr [mailto:Fuhr@etno.eu] Sent: 19 September 2016 11:32 To: 'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>; Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Summary note for ICG site
I am fine with it Lise
-----Original Message----- From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: 17 September 2016 02:34 To: Alissa Cooper Cc: iana-ipr@nro.net Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Summary note for ICG site
Looks good to me.
-- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums.
On Sep 16, 2016, at 17:10, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Here is a draft note for posting to the ICG site.
—
Summary of Changes to IANA IPR Agreements
There were seven public comments <link> submitted regarding the IANA IPR agreements, one of which was a correction to a previously submitted comment.
One comment <http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/2016-September/000002.html>was about the transition in general. There was nothing actionable for the IPR agreements from this comment.
All of the other comments were supportive of the IANA IPR agreements as written.
As a result, no edits to the agreements were made on the basis of the public comments received.
However, at the time the agreements were put out for public comment, there were a number of placeholders in the text that required further discussion amongst the parties to the agreements and the operational communities in order to be finalized. These items have been addressed as follows:
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
Section 6.1: The term of indemnification has been set at 3 years.
LICENSE AGREEMENT
Section 4.3.c: ICANN agrees to cover cost of ongoing enforcement actions existing as of the Effective Date.
Section 7.4: The venue of arbitration will be New York and three arbitrators will be appointed if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator.
Exhibit D, Item 5: Clarification provided that the use of ‘IANA’ as an entity name is permitted in archived RFCs and other documents.
COMMUNITY AGREEMENT
Preamble: ICANN has been identified as the Names Community signatory.
Section 1.24: The following definition of "Names Community" has been provided, as agreed by the CWG: [TBD].
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
On 17 Sep 2016, at 01:10, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Here is a draft note for posting to the ICG site.
This looks fine to me. Alan Barrett
participants (7)
-
Alan Barrett -
Alissa Cooper -
Andrew Sullivan -
Greg Shatan -
Jari Arkko -
Jonathan Robinson -
Lise Fuhr