
All here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow. Best regards, Jorge Jorge L. Contreras Contreras Legal Strategy LLC 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710 Washington, DC 20036 contreraslegal@att.net The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.

On 10 Aug 2016, at 05:41, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
I have just noticed that the list of domain names in this Community Agreement document includes only iana.com, iana.net, and iana.org, but some other documents included “internetassignednumbersauthority” domain names. I suggest that the lists in all document should be identical. Alan Barrett

All, I have a few changes and comments in the attached. Most, if not all, should be noncontroversial. They are marked in track changes on top of Jorge's changes, along with a couple of marginal comments (i.e., appearing in the margin, not necessarily of marginal value). Greg On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> wrote:
On 10 Aug 2016, at 05:41, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
I have just noticed that the list of domain names in this Community Agreement document includes only iana.com, iana.net, and iana.org, but some other documents included “internetassignednumbersauthority” domain names. I suggest that the lists in all document should be identical.
Alan Barrett
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr

Greg: One concern: We should not use “encumbrance” in the definition of “Encumbrance”. Russ On Aug 10, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
I have a few changes and comments in the attached. Most, if not all, should be noncontroversial. They are marked in track changes on top of Jorge's changes, along with a couple of marginal comments (i.e., appearing in the margin, not necessarily of marginal value).
Greg
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> wrote:
On 10 Aug 2016, at 05:41, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
I have just noticed that the list of domain names in this Community Agreement document includes only iana.com, iana.net, and iana.org, but some other documents included “internetassignednumbersauthority” domain names. I suggest that the lists in all document should be identical.
Alan Barrett
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
<GS Comments on Community-Agreement - 08-08-2016 marked against 08-05 (1).docx>_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr

Greg:
One concern: We should not use ³encumbrance² in the definition of ³Encumbrance².
Russ
We should use ³encumbrance². There is not a recursive problem here. It¹s a condensation definition.

I have no concerns with Greg¹s comments, but the change to the RIR definition should be discussed with RIR. From: <iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net> on behalf of Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 9:19 AM To: Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> Cc: "iana-ipr@nro.net" <iana-ipr@nro.net>, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement
All,
I have a few changes and comments in the attached. Most, if not all, should be noncontroversial. They are marked in track changes on top of Jorge's changes, along with a couple of marginal comments (i.e., appearing in the margin, not necessarily of marginal value).
Greg
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> wrote:
On 10 Aug 2016, at 05:41, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:
All here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
I have just noticed that the list of domain names in this Community Agreement document includes only iana.com <http://iana.com> , iana.net <http://iana.net> , and iana.org <http://iana.org> , but some other documents included ³internetassignednumbersauthority² domain names. I suggest that the lists in all document should be identical.
Alan Barrett
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr

On Aug 10, 2016, at 1:38 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> wrote:
On 10 Aug 2016, at 05:41, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:
All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF. I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
I have just noticed that the list of domain names in this Community Agreement document includes only iana.com, iana.net, and iana.org, but some other documents included “internetassignednumbersauthority” domain names. I suggest that the lists in all document should be identical.
It appears that http://www.internetassignednumbersauthority.org, http://www.internetassignednumbersauthority.com, and http://www.internetassignednumbersauthority.net are all serving the IANA home page. Russ
participants (4)
-
Alan Barrett
-
Greg Shatan
-
Jorge Contreras
-
Russ Housley