IANA IPR Follow-up Call #8 | 25 Aug 16 | Meeting Notes & Chat

Dear all, Please find below the notes and chat of IANA IPR call #8, held on 08 Aug 16. Recordings of the meeting are currently unavailable due to a technical issue. They will be posted under the Meetings and Work Session section of the Implementation page found here: https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation if the issue can be resolved. Thank you. Nathalie. IANA IPR Follow-Up Call Thursday, 25 August @ 16:30 UTC Notes: 1. Legal issues deferred from last week · Indemnification: nature and duration (assignment agreement) - to be discussed with ICANN Legal · Arbitration items (license agreement) - Art. 7.4 has a few brackets that need to be eliminated. - to be discussed with ICANN Legal 2. Update on CWG issues discussed last week · Names community signatory (community agreement) - ICANN will be the counterparty. Looking into ways to proceed without bylaws changes. · Definition of names community - under discussion, still to be determined. 3. Proposed timeline and process for comment handling · ACTION (staff): send doodle for meetings on Sept 19 (2hrs) and Sept 21 (1hr) · ACTION (staff): send doodle for follow-up call week of Sept 5th. Chat: Brenda Brewer:Good day all and welcome to the IANA IPR Follow-up call on Thursday, 25 August 2016 @ 16:30 UTC! Josh Hofheimer (Sidley):Have there been many comments, or more specifically any substantive responses requestingchanges Josh Hofheimer (Sidley):Correct, CWG does not have any significant concerns, and no comment on the indemnity issue Alan Barrett:Josh: comments are here: http://ianacg.org/pipermail/ianaiprpubliccomment_ianacg.org/ Alan Barrett:There has been only one comment so far, from the NRO, supporting the draft agreements. Trang Nguyen:Sorry, having trouble connecting audio Trang Nguyen:Will be happy to touch base with Sam regarding this. Lise Fuhr:Agree andrew sullivan:hurray! Greg Shatan:If we wanted to formally expand the IANA Function Review's scope to reviewing ICANN's performance as the signatory, that would require a Bylaws change. But that lily does not need to be gilded. Greg Shatan:Not that I know of. Jari Arkko:I have heard only what Andrew said Nathalie Vergnolle:Correct, no call scheduled. andrew sullivan:Note that this slot will _not_ work on the 8th because the Trust is meeting then
participants (1)
-
Nathalie Vergnolle