+1 and there is no objection raised from any of the RIRs on this execution mechanism of signing in counterparts. Thanks, -Michael -- Michael R. Abejuela Associate General Counsel ARIN PO Box 232290 Centreville, VA 20120 (703) 227-9875 (p) (703) 263-0111 (f) mabejuela@arin.net Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, copy, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. On 9/27/16, 4:08 PM, "iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of Jorge Contreras" <iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of contreraslegal@att.net> wrote:
I thought we already discussed the simultaneous signature by all and exchange of PDF signature pages. This method is fine under the agreements and when we asked, nobody raised an objection under local law. So this method would work and is better than scanning the same document multiple times in succession.
On 9/27/16, 1:43 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net on behalf of alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Ray, Sam, does signing in parallel work for you? If so, and if we hear back from you before Wednesday¹s call, I think we can cancel the call since this is the main item we would need to discuss. Please advise.
Thanks, Alissa
On Sep 27, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett@afrinic.net> wrote:
On 27 Sep 2016, at 22:13, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
I haven't seen any responses to this, so I'm curious how this is being handled.
In the interests of time, it might make sense to sign in counterparts (i.e., each signatory signs on its own sheet of paper), rather than in sequence. This will be legally effective. Signatories can always execute on a single document later on, for posterity. (In other words, this should be signed in parallel, rather than serially.)
I agree with signing in parallel. The documents explicitly allow this; for example, clause 7.9 of the Commuity Agreement says:
7.9 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute together the same document.
Alan Barrett _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
_______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr@nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr