October 2016 - Iana-ipr - nro-apps-2.ripe.net

CCG Composition; Email List, Wikispace; Hyderabad
by Greg Shatan 21 Oct '16

21 Oct '16

It would be very helpful to have a list of all those in the CCG from the 3 communities, and to establish a mailing list for the CCG. >From the names community, we have: Greg Shatan (co-chair) gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com Maarten Simon maarten.simon(a)sidn.nl Christopher Wilkinson lists(a)christopherwilkinson.eu (Both are copied here, although I know that they will be unable to reply to the iana-ipr list). If the numbers and protocol parameters communities could remind us of their representatives that would be most helpful. We can then have ICANN set up a mailing list and Wikispace for the CCG, unless there are views that this is best done elsewhere. Finally, it might be useful for those CCG members in Hyderabad to meet informally. I will be in Hyderabad, and it would be helpful to know who else will be there. Thanks! Greg

5 7

Re: [Iana-ipr] Removal of the term "IANA" from documentation
by Nathalie Vergnolle 04 Oct '16

04 Oct '16

From: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen(a)icann.org<mailto:trang.nguyen@icann.org>> Date: Monday, October 3, 2016 at 11:02 AM To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>>, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett(a)afrinic.net<mailto:alan.barrett@afrinic.net>> Cc: "iana-ipr(a)nro.net<mailto:iana-ipr@nro.net>" <iana-ipr(a)nro.net<mailto:iana-ipr@nro.net>> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Removal of the term "IANA" from documentation All, This page somehow got missed when we were reviewing updates to iana.org pages. As flagged by Greg and Alan, removing "IANA" is indeed not what we are doing at all. Rather, the reference to "IANA" is being updated to comply with the usage requirements of the IPR agreements. We have taken down the page and will post an updated page soon. Best, Trang From: <iana-ipr-bounces(a)nro.net<mailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net>> on behalf of Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>> Date: Monday, October 3, 2016 at 10:23 AM To: Alan Barrett <alan.barrett(a)afrinic.net<mailto:alan.barrett@afrinic.net>> Cc: "iana-ipr(a)nro.net<mailto:iana-ipr@nro.net>" <iana-ipr(a)nro.net<mailto:iana-ipr@nro.net>> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Removal of the term "IANA" from documentation Alan, Thank you for pointing this out. It concerns me as well. I assume this is based on an interpretation of the IANA trademark license. What is this interpretation, and how is it is being communicated?, etc. What are the changes, exactly? What effect will they have? Will there be any technical effects whatsoever. It's unfortunate that this information wasn't communicated to this group during the planning phase of this project. My gut reaction is that this is potentially a misinterpretation or over-reaction to elements of the trademark license. But I don't want to jump to conclusions without additional information. Greg On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett(a)afrinic.net<mailto:alan.barrett@afrinic.net>> wrote: I see this text at <https://www.iana.org/help/pti-transition[iana.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.iana.org_help_pti-…>>: [[[ The term "IANA" can no longer be used how it has been used in the past. As a result much of our documentation has been revised to remove the term. ]]] I could understand if ICANN/PTI were changing the bare term "IANA" to more specific terms like "IANA operator", "IANA functions", "IANA services", etc., but removing the term doesn't seem useful to me. Could somebody explain the reasoning behind this change? Alan Barrett _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list Iana-ipr(a)nro.net<mailto:Iana-ipr@nro.net> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr[nro.net]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nro.net_mailman_li…>

1 0

Removal of the term "IANA" from documentation
by Alan Barrett 03 Oct '16

03 Oct '16

I see this text at <https://www.iana.org/help/pti-transition>: [[[ The term “IANA” can no longer be used how it has been used in the past. As a result much of our documentation has been revised to remove the term. ]]] I could understand if ICANN/PTI were changing the bare term “IANA” to more specific terms like “IANA operator”, “IANA functions”, “IANA services”, etc., but removing the term doesn’t seem useful to me. Could somebody explain the reasoning behind this change? Alan Barrett

2 1

Agreements Executed and Published
by Ray Pelletier 03 Oct '16

03 Oct '16

All; All the agreements have been signed by the parties and are available online at: https://trustee.ietf.org/iana.html Great job everyone. Thanks Ray

5 4

Re: [Iana-ipr] Action: IPR Assignment Execution
by Samantha Eisner 01 Oct '16

01 Oct '16

Hi Ray - Attached are the 5 signature pages executed by ICANN. Congratulations to all on completing these agreements. It¹s been a pleasure coordinating with you. Sam ‹ Samantha Eisner Deputy General Counsel, ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90094 USA Direct Dial: +1 310 578 8631 On 9/30/16, 7:21 AM, "Ray Pelletier" <rpelletier(a)isoc.org> wrote: >Thanks. > >The radio silence was unnerving. >;) >Ray > >> On Sep 30, 2016, at 10:07 AM, Samantha Eisner >><Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Ray - >> >> Ive received the various signature pages this morning. Our Board >>meeting is set for 4pm pacific today, and we will return these shortly >>after receiving approval to sign. >> >> Samantha Eisner >> Deputy General Counsel, ICANN >> 12025 Waterfront Dr., Suite 300 >> Los Angeles, California 90066 >> +1.310.578.8631 >> >>> On Sep 30, 2016, at 7:04 AM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier(a)isoc.org> wrote: >>> >>> Sam, >>> >>> Please sign, scan and return the Signature Page only. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Ray >>> >>> <Assignment-Agreement-09-21-2016-Final.pdf>

2 1